[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[#63391] Access Modifiers (Internal Interfaces) — Daniel da Silva Ferreira <danieldasilvaferreira@...>
Hi,
3 messages
2014/06/28
[ruby-core:63277] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9740] super: no superclass method in Ruby 2.1.1
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2014-06-22 17:34:31 UTC
List:
ruby-core #63277
Issue #9740 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE
r45585 was already backported into `ruby_2_1` branch at r46190 for #9721.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9740: super: no superclass method in Ruby 2.1.1
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9740#change-47324
* Author: Wei Hu
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE
----------------------------------------
Below code will result into error:
~~~
super: no superclass method `foo' for #<Object:0x002b0430670fe8>
~~~
However, it can pass with Ruby 1.9 and I am not sure if it's feature changes or bug.
~~~ruby
module A
def foo
puts "A"
end
end
module B
def foo
puts "B"
super
end
ub_meth = instance_method :foo
define_method :foo do
ub_meth.bind(self).call()
end
end
a = Object.new
a.extend A
a.extend B
a.foo
~~~
Hi, Nakada,
Thanks for your fix @ r45565, but this still has problem. If we run my original example, it will result into:
~~~
B
B
B
t.rb:9: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
~~~
I think the difference is: in the original example, I used `define_method :foo` to override the foo in Module `B`.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/