[ruby-core:63118] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9884] thread_pthread.c assumes pthread_t is a scalar type

Issue #9884 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.


 On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:33 PM,  <[e-mail]> wrote:
 > Issue #9884 has been updated by Rei Odaira.
 >
 >
 > I was looking at this page:
 > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_types.h.html
 >
 > ~~~
 > IEEE Std 1003.1-2001/Cor 2-2004, item XBD/TC2/D6/26 is applied, adding pthread_t to the list of types that are not required to be arithmetic types, thus allowing pthread_t to be defined as a structure.
 > ~~~
 
 Ah, OK. Got it. Thanks.

----------------------------------------
Bug #9884: thread_pthread.c assumes pthread_t is a scalar type
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9884#change-47180

* Author: Rei Odaira
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: 
* Target version: 
* ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-05-30 trunk 46238) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Many code lines in `thread_pthread.c` assume `pthread_t` is a scalar type. For example,

~~~
    thread_debug("ubf_select_each (%p)\n", (void *)th->thread_id);
~~~

and

~~~
    if (!timer_thread_id) {
~~~

I don't think the standard guarantees `pthread_t` is a scalar type.  z/OS defines `pthread_t` as a struct, and there seem to be other such environments.
https://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32/faq.html

I understand it could be too cumbersome to rewrite the source, assuming `pthread_t` might not be a scalar, and actually I am not sure what would be the best way to rewrite it, but I appreciate it if you guys could think of it for the maximum portability. If needed, I am willing to list the source lines to be rewritten.

---Files--------------------------------
opaque_thread_id.patch (7.63 KB)


-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/