[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[#63391] Access Modifiers (Internal Interfaces) — Daniel da Silva Ferreira <danieldasilvaferreira@...>
Hi,
3 messages
2014/06/28
[ruby-core:62962] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9909] [Open] why shouldn't constant lookup check the nesting of module's name
From:
meanlogin@...
Date:
2014-06-06 14:43:19 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62962
Issue #9909 has been reported by First Last. ---------------------------------------- Feature #9909: why shouldn't constant lookup check the nesting of module's name https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9909 * Author: First Last * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- module A module B end end above, B will have access to A's constants but below, it won't module A::B end is there a reason why the nesting of the name should not be part of the constant resolution algorithm? when adding or reopening (deeply) nested modules/classes the :: syntax would be preferable, but you lose constant resolution -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/