From: "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
Date: 2013-10-02T06:14:32+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:57565] [CommonRuby - Feature #8259] Atomic attributes	accessors


Issue #8259 has been updated by headius (Charles Nutter).

Target version set to Ruby 2.1.0

Trying to wake this one up in hopes of getting it into 2.1. Is there any chance?

Forgive me if I'm breaking process somehow, but ko1 told me to mark the issues I want in 2.1 with Target version=2.1, so I've been doing that.
----------------------------------------
Feature #8259: Atomic attributes accessors
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8259#change-42182

Author: funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: Ruby 2.1.0


=begin
Motivated by this gist ((<URL:https://gist.github.com/jstorimer/5298581>)) and atomic gem

I propose Class.attr_atomic which will add methods for atomic swap and CAS:

  class MyNode
    attr_accessor :item
    attr_atomic :successor

    def initialize(item, successor)
      @item = item
      @successor = successor
    end
  end
  node = MyNode.new(i, other_node)

  # attr_atomic ensures at least #{attr} reader method exists. May be, it should
  # be sure it does volatile access.
  node.successor

  # #{attr}_cas(old_value, new_value) do CAS: atomic compare and swap
  if node.successor_cas(other_node, new_node)
    print "there were no interleaving with other threads"
  end

  # #{attr}_swap atomically swaps value and returns old value.
  # It ensures that no other thread interleaves getting old value and setting
  # new one by cas (or other primitive if exists, like in Java 8)
  node.successor_swap(new_node)

It will be very simple for MRI cause of GIL, and it will use atomic primitives for
other implementations.

Note: both (({#{attr}_swap})) and (({#{attr}_cas})) should raise an error if instance variable were not explicitly set before.

Example for nonblocking queue: ((<URL:https://gist.github.com/funny-falcon/5370416>))

Something similar should be proposed for Structs. May be override same method as (({Struct.attr_atomic}))

Open question for reader:
should (({attr_atomic :my_attr})) ensure that #my_attr reader method exists?
Should it guarantee that (({#my_attr})) provides 'volatile' access?
May be, (({attr_reader :my_attr})) already ought to provide 'volatile' semantic?
May be, semantic of (({@my_attr})) should have volatile semantic (i doubt for that)?
=end



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/