[#57574] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8976][Open] file-scope freeze_string directive — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
70 messages
2013/10/02
[#57579] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8977][Open] String#frozen that takes advantage of the deduping — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
25 messages
2013/10/02
[#57633] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8983][Open] [PATCH] GC.stat[:heap_free_num] returns number of unused slots on heap — "tmm1 (Aman Gupta)" <ruby@...1.net>
8 messages
2013/10/03
[#57667] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8985][Open] xwillfree - promise to free memory — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
5 messages
2013/10/04
[#57679] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987][Open] map/collect extension which handles arguments — "sowieso (So Wieso)" <sowieso@...>
16 messages
2013/10/05
[#57680] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8987] map/collect extension which handles arguments
— "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
2013/10/05
[#57693] [PATCH 0/2] Fix strptime '%s' — Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2013/10/07
[#57694] [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
'%s' is meant to imply UTC, however:
[#57703] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/10/07
2013/10/7 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>:
[#57711] Re: [PATCH 1/2] time: fix strptime '%s'
— Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...>
2013/10/07
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#57705] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992][Open] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
43 messages
2013/10/07
[#57840] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8992] Use String#freeze and compiler tricks to replace "str"f suffix
— "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
2013/10/13
[#57727] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998][Open] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
17 messages
2013/10/08
[#57743] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
2013/10/08
[#57756] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8998] string keys for hash literals should use fstrings
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/09
I think my failed patch exposes a bug with lazy sweep + rb_fstring.
[#57771] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008][Open] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...>
15 messages
2013/10/09
[#57852] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/14
[#57884] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9008] TestProcess#test_clock_getres_constants and TestProcess#test_clock_gettime_constants fails on ARM
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/15
[#57794] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9011][Open] rb_fstring unsafe to use in general case — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
4 messages
2013/10/10
[#57812] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9013][Open] Crash on start — "lemonez (Dmitry Popov)" <lemon@...>
6 messages
2013/10/10
[#57813] ruby-2.0.0-p247siphash.c:443: bug report — David Binderman <dcb314@...>
Hello there=2C=0A=
4 messages
2013/10/10
[#57849] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9020][Open] Net::HTTPResponse predicate/query methods — "timcraft (Tim Craft)" <redmine@...>
7 messages
2013/10/14
[#57862] [CommonRuby - Feature #9023][Open] Array#tail — "fuadksd (Fuad Saud)" <fuadksd@...>
9 messages
2013/10/15
[#57912] [CommonRuby - Feature #9023] Array#tail
— "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
2013/10/17
[#57888] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9025][Open] Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments — Nerian (Gonzalo Rodríguez) <siotopo@...>
11 messages
2013/10/15
[#57913] cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0? — Stefan Salewski <mail@...>
Dear Sirs,
4 messages
2013/10/17
[#57916] Re: cxxflags for C++ library bindings not working for Ruby 1.9.x and 2.0?
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2013/10/17
(13/10/17 22:03), Stefan Salewski wrote:
[#57950] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9039][Open] [PATCH] socket: avoid unnecessary ppoll/select on Linux (part 3) — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57951] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040][Open] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them — "eweb (Eamonn Webster)" <eamonn.webster@...>
8 messages
2013/10/21
[#57986] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9040] Readline duplicate file descriptors but doesn't close them
— "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
2013/10/23
[#57967] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9043][Open] Add String#f method as shortcut for #freeze — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
8 messages
2013/10/22
[#58007] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049][Open] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing — "mohawkjohn (John Woods)" <john.o.woods@...>
25 messages
2013/10/24
[#58011] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
2013/10/24
[#58012] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— David MacMahon <davidm@...>
2013/10/24
[#58013] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing
— Fuad Saud <fuadksd@...>
2013/10/24
How is a:b better than a..b=3F two dots are straightforward, unambiguous,=
[#58080] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064][Open] Add support for packages, like in Java — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
23 messages
2013/10/30
[#58083] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9064] Add support for packages, like in Java
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2013/10/30
[#58114] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64 — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2013/10/31
[#58115] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2013/10/31
(10/31/13 3:42 PM), normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#58116] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9068][Open] [PATCH (trivial)] thread.c: reduce rb_mutex_t size by 8 bytes on x86_64
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2013/10/31
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[ruby-core:57899] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9025] Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments
From:
duerst (Martin Dürst) <duerst@...>
Date:
2013-10-16 04:03:55 UTC
List:
ruby-core #57899
Issue #9025 has been updated by duerst (Martin D端rst).
phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin) wrote:
> This is sort of a bike-shedding issue, and I'm always happy to throw paint at bike sheds!
>
> In the past, in various languages and environments, I've tended to use:
> "wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)"
That's a good way to put it, and very close to Nerian's
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (expected: 1, provided: 0)
(close enough to really just be bikeshedding)
> While I agree that it would be nice to support ruby newbies with nice meaningful errors, I believe that the current message already conveys all the information required to comprehend it. Critically "wrong number of arguments" is pretty universal for programmers, even without relying on English per se, and the smallest amount of debugging will show that one of those numbers corresponds with the invocation causing the error, and therefore the other number must be the correct "number of arguments" for that method.
Ruby is all about making it easier for the programmer. Even the smallest amount of debugging is too much when it can be eliminated by tweaking the error message. This is definitely finetuning, but it's not bikeshedding.
----------------------------------------
Feature #9025: Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9025#change-42494
Author: Nerian (Gonzalo Rodr鱈guez)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Currently when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments we get a confusing error message:
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 0)
That means that the method was meant to accept 0 arguments, but 1 was provided instead. This error message is confusing, and a large number of people had to search for its meaning. For example [1] has 11000 views.
I propose that we change the error message to something whose meaning is obvious. Examples:
* ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (expected: 1, provided: 0)
* ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 instead of 0)
This ticket originated from this pull request: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/367
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7537450/what-does-wrong-number-of-arguments-1-for-0-mean-in-ruby
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/