From: "yekka (Nikolay Bozhenov)" Date: 2013-10-10T03:21:15+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:57792] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9009][Open] Wrong binding when tracing c-calls Issue #9009 has been reported by yekka (Nikolay Bozhenov). ---------------------------------------- Bug #9009: Wrong binding when tracing c-calls https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9009 Author: yekka (Nikolay Bozhenov) Status: Open Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-10-04 trunk 43141) [x86_64-linux] Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN When I use set_trace_func to trace ruby code, I get a wrong binding in case of c-calls. In this case binding.eval("self") is not the receiver of the call. Whereas in case of ruby-calls binding.eval("self") yields the receiver of the call. The underlying problem is that c-calls aren't pushed onto the frame stack. It seems that currently there is no way to find out the receiver of c-call inside tracing function. Example of code: $ cat test.rb class IO def some_method end end puts "true receiver is #{$stdout}\n\n" set_trace_func proc { |event, file, line, id, binding, classname| if event == "call" or event == "c-call" puts "#{event} #{id}:" puts "\tapparent receiver = #{binding.eval("self")}" puts "\tbacktrace:" caller.each { |l| puts "\t\t#{l}" } puts end } $stdout.write "" # c-call $stdout.some_method # ruby-call Execution: $ ruby test.rb true receiver is # c-call write: apparent receiver = main backtrace: test.rb:18:in `
' call some_method: apparent receiver = # backtrace: test.rb:2:in `some_method' test.rb:19:in `
' Expected result: true receiver is # c-call write: apparent receiver = # backtrace: somewhere:in `write' test.rb:18:in `
' call some_method: apparent receiver = # backtrace: test.rb:2:in `some_method' test.rb:19:in `
' -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/