From: Fuad Saud Date: 2013-10-24T04:39:21-02:00 Subject: [ruby-core:58013] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9049] Shorthands (a:b, *) for inclusive indexing --5268c099_54e49eb4_1136 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline How is a:b better than a..b=3F two dots are straightforward, unambiguous,= well known. I don=E2=80=99t see a need for it. As for =7B =E2=80=99ten=E2=80=99: 10 =7D= , I agree it=E2=80=99s discussable if it=E2=80=99s gonna evaluate to a st= ring or a symbol. If it=E2=80=99s a symbol you pretty muck kill consisten= cy in the case other things will be acceptable on the left side (like =7B= 1: 1, 2: 4, =7Blol: =E2=80=98wut=E2=80=99: 9 =7D, evaluate=5Fthis.method= : =E2=80=99the result'). =20 -- =20 =46uad Saud Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/=3Fsig) --5268c099_54e49eb4_1136 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
How is a:b better than a..b=3F two dots are straightforward, unambiguous= , well known.

I don=E2=80=99t see a need for it. As for =7B =E2=80=99ten=E2=80=99: 10 = =7D, I agree it=E2=80=99s discussable if it=E2=80=99s gonna evaluate to a= string or a symbol. If it=E2=80=99s a symbol you pretty muck kill consis= tency in the case other things will be acceptable on the left side (like = =7B 1: 1, 2: 4, =7Blol: =E2=80=98wut=E2=80=99: 9 =7D, evaluate=5Fthis.met= hod: =E2=80=99the result').

-- 
=46uad Saud
Sent with S= parrow

--5268c099_54e49eb4_1136--