[#53893] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8204][Open] ObjectSpace.each_object(Bignum) can generate Bignums that are to small to be Bignums — "Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak)" <hanmac@...>
[#53914] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8206][Open] Should Ruby core implement String#blank? — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#53922] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8208][Open] Raise cached exceptions for nonblocking IO to avoid allocation/stack-copying costs — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
"headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#53950] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8211][Open] Performance regression of method calls — "dunric (David Unric)" <dunric29a@...>
[#53974] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8215][Open] Support accessing Fiber-locals and backtraces for a Fiber — "halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)" <ruby-lang-bugs@...>
[#54023] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8223][Open] Make Matrix more omnivorous. — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#54031] Question about r39944 — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
Even if test directory should be on the load path on test-all, you should
[#54095] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8237][Open] Logical method chaining via inferred receiver — "wardrop (Tom Wardrop)" <tom@...>
[#54175] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8254][Open] Ruby segfaults on second SystemStackError from parser — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charlie@...>
[#54185] [CommonRuby - Feature #8257][Open] Exception#cause to carry originating exception along with new one — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
(2013/04/12 1:40), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#54196] Encouraging use of CommonRuby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I think we need to do more to encourage the use of the CommonRuby
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
As far as I understand, what is CommonRuby and the process over CommonRuby
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:25 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
(2013/04/12 16:40), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
[#54201] Has ObjectSpace changed recently? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I just noticed that in 2.0, I see this:
[#54207] [CommonRuby - Feature #8258][Open] Dir#escape_glob — "steveklabnik (Steve Klabnik)" <steve@...>
[#54218] [CommonRuby - Feature #8259][Open] Atomic attributes accessors — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
Issue #8259 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
I'm not sure if setting the attribute on the ivar is a good way to go.
[#54333] Requesting Commit Access — Aman Gupta <ruby@...1.net>
Hello ruby-core,
Hi,
[#54415] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8286][Open] Can't decode non-MIME Base64 — "adacosta (Alan Da Costa)" <alandacosta@...>
[#54459] [CommonRuby - Feature #8291][Open] Allow retrieving the root Fiber of a Thread — "halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)" <ruby-lang@...>
[#54473] [Backport 200 - Backport #8299][Open] Minor error in float parsing — "bobjalex (Bob Alexander)" <bobjalex@...>
[#54509] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8310][Open] resque-web crashes with segfault on Ruby 2.0.0-p0 only, Resque 1.24.1, Redis 2.6.12 — "vaharoni (Amit Aharoni)" <amit.sites@...>
[#54559] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8321][Open] Ripper: I would like coordinates for keywords — "ericp (Eric Promislow)" <eric.promislow@...>
[#54606] Plan to the first 2.0.0 patchlevel release. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello, Rubyists.
Hi,
Could you please backport the following:
[#54621] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8339][Open] Introducing Geneartional Garbage Collection for CRuby/MRI — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2013/04/28 9:23), authorNari (Narihiro Nakamura) wrote:
2013/4/28 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
(2013/05/04 12:08), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
2013/5/4 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
(2013/05/06 11:50), Tanaka Akira wrote:
2013/5/6 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 8:19 PM, ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
(2013/04/28 21:40), Magnus Holm wrote:
(2013/04/28 23:34), SASADA Koichi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2013/04/29 1:19), Magnus Holm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 6:29 PM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#54665] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8344][Open] Status of Psych and Syck — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
[ruby-core:54210] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8110] Regex methods not changing global variables
Issue #8110 has been updated by phluid61 (Matthew Kerwin).
=begin
sam.saffron (Sam Saffron) wrote:
> Has anyone given any thought at how to make this friendly with older
> versions of Ruby ... say I have
>
> def is_foo?(val)
> val =~ /foo/
> end
>
> And now I want this code to work in both 1.9.3 and master.
>
> # ugly and slow
> def is_foo?(val)
> if defined? Regexp::SKIP_GLOBALS
> val =~ /foo/G
> else
> val =~ /foo/
> end
> end
[snip]
> # least horribly imho
> IS_FOO = _G(/foo/)
> def is_foo?(val)
> val =~ IS_FOO
> end
>
> ---
>
> So I wonder, is the plan to backport this? Are there any other ways to
> keep code compatible and clean?
Defining a (({_G})) method in 1.9.* is no more or less a backport than allowing (and possibly ignoring) a /G modifier, and is pretty ugly to boot. I see no harm in adding some amount of /G support to 1.9.x and 2.0.0, once (if) the functionality is added to trunk, however I also think it is reasonable to expect developers to either
(1) target 2.0.1 by using language features only supported by 2.0.1, or
(2) target <=2.0.0 and 2.0.1 by only using language features that haven't changed, or
(3) go to lengths to explicitly polyfill the older language versions.
Similar things happened with parser changes from 1.8 to 1.9 when adding the new (({{a: 1}})) hash syntax (which makes new code not work in old ruby) and removing the (({if x: y; end})) syntax (which makes old code not work in new ruby). At least adding a new pattern modifier doesn't break old code. In fact, it doesn't change the behaviour of the old code at all.
Also note that your "ugly and slow" code won't work because the parser still attempts (and fails) to parse (({/foo/G})) even if the condition is false.
To make your code fully backwards-compatible you'd probably use something like:
IS_FOO = Regexp.new('foo', defined?(Regexp::SKIP_GLOBALS) ? Regexp::SKIP_GLOBALS : 0)
def is_foo? val
val =~ IS_FOO
end
I also note you've changed /S to /G in your examples.
=end
----------------------------------------
Feature #8110: Regex methods not changing global variables
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8110#change-38483
Author: prijutme4ty (Ilya Vorontsov)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Category: core
Target version: next minor
It is useful to have methods allowing pattern matching without setting global variables. It can be very hard to understand where the problem is when you for example insert a string like `puts pat === my_str` and your program fails in a place which is far-far away from inserted place. This can happen due to replacing global variables of previous pattern match. I caught to this when placed pattern-match inside case-statement and shadowed global vars which were initially filled by match in when-statement.
For now one can extract pattern matching into another method thus defining method-scope for that variables. But sometimes it looks like an overkill. May be simple method like #match_globalsafe can prevent that kind of errors. At least when a programmer see such a method in a list of methods, he's warned that usual match can cause such problems.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/