From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Date: 2013-04-03T20:30:36+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:53958] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8191] Short-hand syntax for duck-typing

Em 02-04-2013 22:39, "Martin J. D��rst" escreveu:
> On 2013/04/03 9:54, wardrop (Tom Wardrop) wrote:
>>
>> Issue #8191 has been updated by wardrop (Tom Wardrop).
>
>> @davidderyldowney, ideally, a single question mark would probably 
>> make that clearer, but alas, a single question mark serves another 
>> purpose. The question mark prefix is always an option though as well, 
>> e.g.
>
> How does this work with methods that already have a ? at the end? Will 
> we get something like include???, or what?

 From a practical view this is unlikely to happen because a method 
ending with a question mark should return true or false. What method 
would you like to call from those values?