[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

15 messages 2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/16

Hi,

[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil

From: Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Date: 2004-11-29 14:30:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #3851
Ryan Davis wrote:

> I found this oddity while running ParseTree over every .rb file in the 
> ruby libs:
> 
>> irb(main):003:0> REXML::Functions.name
>> => nil
> sure enough, Functions::name is defined. This seems bad to me. It also 
> defines id and breaks it too:
> 
>> irb(main):004:0> Class.id
>> => 974456
>> irb(main):005:0> REXML::Functions.id
>> ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (0 for 1)
> Can we get these renamed or otherwise make them work with their regular 
> semantics?

I'm not sure about .id as that should not be used anymore anyway, (use 
.object_id instead) but for REXML::Functions.name a workaround is to use 
Module.instance_method(:name).bind(REXML::Functions).call


In This Thread