Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

> On Saturday 27 November 2004 06:26 pm, Florian Groß wrote:
> | Would it be possible to let set_trace_func() return the trace func that
> | was set before the current one gets stored? This would be very useful
> | when you have a temporary trace func that will go away quickly. I'd find
> | this particularly useful for letting Binding.of_caller and Tracer
> | coexist peacefully, but I'm pretty sure there are a lot more use cases.
> 
> Would a stack be even better?

Yes, but I'm trying to keep the changes as small as possible for 
increasing the chance of it getting made. If your suggestion were to be 
implemented that would be even better, but I'm also happy with the 
original proposal.