ruby-core

When I run a ruby program for a long time, it sometimes gives segmentation fault. I've tried the stable version 1.8.1 and all the development versions. When I compile the source code it gaves segmentation fault when running a program for a long time, but running with the ruby rpm package from fedora core 2, it runs perfectly for a long time without giving seg fault. Is there some especial way to configure the compilation? Somebody knowns what I 'm talking about? :P

1 message 2004/11/16

[#3755] Regexp: compile error vs. exception — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/11/16

[#3757] Re: Regexp: compile error vs. exception — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/17

Hi,

[#3756] Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

I'm having some very strange build problems on Windows, and thought

4 messages 2004/11/17

[#3759] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/11/17

Hello,

[#3761] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/11/17

On Nov 16, 2004, at 22:48, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#3763] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/11/18

Hello.

[#3762] x.include? speed observation — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I wondered about implementing a fairly small set of present/absent flags and

1 message 2004/11/17

[#3765] Readline.completion_append_character in latest snapshot — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

In ruby 1.9.0 (2004-11-18) [i686-linux], something changed in readline,

2 messages 2004/11/19

[#3767] Re: [BUG] Readline.completion_append_character in latest snapshot — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/11/19

Hi,

[#3766] Make READ_DATA_PENDING use __fpending() if available — noreply@...

Patches item #1074, was opened at 2004-11-18 16:20

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3768] rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

% rdoc -1

4 messages 2004/11/19

[#3776] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/20

[#3778] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/11/20

[#3781] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/20

[#3769] Forwardable warnings — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3770] OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2004/11/19

[#3772] Re: OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/11/19

Lothar Scholz wrote:

[#3775] Re: OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/11/19

James Britt wrote:

[#3771] Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/11/19

[#3779] Re: Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3780] Re: Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3773] mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

Would it make sense to have $LOCAL_LIBS as a dependency for the DLLIB

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3774] Nicer traceback at Interrupt — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/11/19

[#3777] Re: [PATCH] Nicer traceback at Interrupt — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3782] RDoc and requires — noreply@...

Bugs item #1083, was opened at 2004-11-22 14:51

1 message 2004/11/22

[#3783] Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2004/11/22

[#3794] Re: Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/11/23

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 10:55, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#3797] Re: Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/11/23

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:27, Tom Copeland wrote:

[#3784] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — noreply@...

Bugs item #1084, was opened at 2004-11-22 23:21

1 message 2004/11/22

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23

[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3788] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3789] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3820] Re: ruby -y — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/25

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3822] Re: ruby -y — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3823] Re: ruby -y — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/25

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3790] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3791] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "J" == Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:

[#3792] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3795] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3793] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3796] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3786] Please commit erb.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2004/11/23

[#3802] Re: Please commit erb.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/11/24

On Tuesday, November 23, 2004, 6:55:06 PM, Gavin wrote:

[#3813] Re: Please commit erb.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3798] Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — Christian Reiniger <creinig@...>

Following code:

3 messages 2004/11/23

[#3803] Re: Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3804] Re: Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — Christian Reiniger <creinig@...> 2004/11/24

On Wednesday 24 November 2004 12:13, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3800] autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

4 messages 2004/11/24

[#3801] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3805] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/24

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3808] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3806] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — noreply@...

Bugs item #1095, was opened at 2004-11-24 16:48

3 messages 2004/11/24

[#3807] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1095 ] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3811] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1095 ] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3809] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — noreply@...

Bugs item #1107, was opened at 2004-11-24 15:25

6 messages 2004/11/24

[#3810] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3812] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/25

[#3814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/25

[#3816] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/11/25

In article <Pine.GSO.4.61.0411250838140.6746@pjakkur.iar.se>,

[#3818] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3824] CVS/CIA — David Ross <dross@...>

Greetings everyone civil,

1 message 2004/11/25

[#3831] File::Stat#blksize for Win32 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/11/27

[#3832] CGI::Session invokes nonexistent method — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

In the current HEAD and in the ruby_1.8 branch, CGI::Session tries to

2 messages 2004/11/27

[#3834] Re: CGI::Session invokes nonexistent method — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/27

Hi,

[#3836] Segmentation fault with StringIO#puts and StringIO#rewind — noreply@...

Bugs item #1120, was opened at 2004-11-27 08:37

2 messages 2004/11/27

[#3847] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1120 ] Segmentation fault with StringIO#puts and StringIO#rewind — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/29

Hi,

[#3838] RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

4 messages 2004/11/27

[#3854] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2004/11/29

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 08:26:06AM +0900, Florian Growrote:

[#3839] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/11/27

On Saturday 27 November 2004 06:26 pm, Florian Groß wrote:

[#3840] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Florian Groß <florgro@...> 2004/11/27

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#3841] Creating a NoOp Node for 'end' statements — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello ruby-core,

1 message 2004/11/28

[#3842] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

6 messages 2004/11/28

[#3843] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/28

Hi,

[#3844] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3845] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/28

Hi,

[#3849] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3855] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/29

Hi,

[#3846] REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I found this oddity while running ParseTree over every .rb file in the

6 messages 2004/11/29

[#3851] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#3857] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/11/30

[#3858] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/30

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:53:38 +0900, Ryan Davis <ryand@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#3859] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/30

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#3864] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/12/02

On Monday 29 November 2004 20:14, Florian Growrote:

[#3848] Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

C:\home>ri Object#singleton_method_added

4 messages 2004/11/29

[#3852] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/29

[#3853] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/29

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:40:48 +0900, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#3850] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#3856] define_method / super — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2004/11/29

[#3860] Wrong test for xmlrpc — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

2 messages 2004/11/30

[#3865] Re: Wrong test for xmlrpc — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/12/02

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

Re: "Old" CVS-revisions of Ruby fail to compile

From: Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

Date: 2004-11-25 08:20:04 UTC

List: ruby-core #3815

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> Johan Holmberg wrote in [ruby-core:03692]:
>> I just tried to compile some old revisions of Ruby, by checking out
>> from CVS how the source looked at a particular time. But it seems
>> like all revisions between 2004-04-28 and 2004-10-31 fail to
>> compile.
>>
>> This seems very strange to me. Can anyone explain what is going on?
>> (I hope I'm missing something obvious, but just now I can't see what
>> I'm doing wrong ...)
>
> A cvs 1.11.x issue.  It ignores default branches in the past.
>

Thanks for the reply.
But I don't understand the implications.

I tried to download and build CVS 1.12.10 and checkout the Ruby 
source with that new CVS client. No difference as far as I can tell 
(I did a "diff -r" on the old and new checkouts and they were 
identical).

Do you mean that the server would be required to run a better 
version than 1.11.x ? Would that fix this problem ?

Or should a better version than 1.11.x have been used when the 
import of the Oniguruma code was done recently. If this is the case, 
does it mean that it is "too late" now ?

/Johan Holmberg

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next