[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

15 messages 2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/16

Hi,

[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

Re: "Old" CVS-revisions of Ruby fail to compile

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2004-11-24 01:41:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #3799
Hi,

At Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:05:57 +0900,
Johan Holmberg wrote in [ruby-core:03692]:
> I just tried to compile some old revisions of Ruby, by checking out 
> from CVS how the source looked at a particular time. But it seems 
> like all revisions between 2004-04-28 and 2004-10-31 fail to 
> compile.
> 
> This seems very strange to me. Can anyone explain what is going on?
> (I hope I'm missing something obvious, but just now I can't see what 
> I'm doing wrong ...)

A cvs 1.11.x issue.  It ignores default branches in the past.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread