[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

15 messages 2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/16

Hi,

[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-11-23 17:11:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #3796
Hi,

In message "Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling"
    on Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:18:44 +0900, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

|Y>   * is there any way to 32 bit Solaris to make __fpending() work as
|Y>     expected?
|
| Well, my big problem is that, in Solaris 8, __fpending() is described as
| (man __fpending) 
|
|     The __fpending function returns in bytes the amount of  out-
|     put pending on a stream.
|
| See "output"

Oh well, so I should cancel the patch.  If someone has any additional
information to make Ruby work on Solaris 64 bit, I would appreciate.


							matz.

In This Thread