[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

15 messages 2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/16

Hi,

[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

Re: ERB suggestions

From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2004-11-16 11:00:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #3748
Gavin Sinclair wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> If 'erb' (Ruby) is going to be part of the standard library, why not
> make it 'erb' (C) for speed?  What do we gain by distributing the slow
> version?
> 
> Second, the Ruby 'erb' interface could be much improved.  Code written
> with it is very cryptic.  I'm happy to prepare a patch, but only if
> there's support for changing it.

Can you give an example, how your proposed non-cryptic code would look like?

Regards,

   Michael

In This Thread