[#3682] x86_64 -- warning and errors — ts <decoux@...>
4 messages
2004/11/02
[#3687] lib/ostruct.rb 1.12 - wrong commit? — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...>
The above mentioned commit makes OpenStructs into singletons, which
4 messages
2004/11/04
[#3694] Ruby 1.8.2 preview3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
10 messages
2004/11/07
[#3696] Re: Ruby 1.8.2 preview3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2004/11/08
[#3711] Converting nil to NULL — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
5 messages
2004/11/11
[#3716] possible bug in method dictionary — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>
NOTE: to repro this bug as written, you must have RubyInline 3.1.0
6 messages
2004/11/12
[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
15 messages
2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/16
Hi --
[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/16
Hi,
[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/16
Hi --
[#3819] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/25
Hi --
[#3821] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
2004/11/25
On Thursday, November 25, 2004, 10:55:53 PM, David wrote:
[#3825] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/25
Hi,
[#3733] Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
9 messages
2004/11/15
[#3734] Re: Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/15
Hi,
[#3735] Re: Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2004/11/15
[#3756] Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I'm having some very strange build problems on Windows, and thought
4 messages
2004/11/17
[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/23
[#3789] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/23
Hi,
[#3790] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/23
[#3791] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/11/23
>>>>> "J" == Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:
[#3792] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/23
Hi,
[#3806] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — noreply@...
Bugs item #1095, was opened at 2004-11-24 16:48
3 messages
2004/11/24
[#3809] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — noreply@...
Bugs item #1107, was opened at 2004-11-24 15:25
6 messages
2004/11/24
[#3810] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/11/24
Hi,
[#3812] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/25
[#3814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/25
[#3842] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
6 messages
2004/11/28
[#3843] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/28
Hi,
[#3846] REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I found this oddity while running ParseTree over every .rb file in the
6 messages
2004/11/29
Re: "Old" CVS-revisions of Ruby fail to compile
From:
Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
Date:
2004-11-18 12:04:46 UTC
List:
ruby-core #3764
About a week ago I asked: > > I just tried to compile some old revisions of Ruby, by checking out from CVS > how the source looked at a particular time. But it seems like all revisions > between 2004-04-28 and 2004-10-31 fail to compile. > [...] > > Can others reproduce this? > Or even better, explain what is going on? > I haven't seen any answer yet. Do you think it doesn't matter if old versions (specified by date) are possible to reproduce? I have several times found it useful to be able to "go back in time", and I think it is quite unfortunate that the archives have been made more or less useless in this respect. I don't know any details about what has happened to the archives, but it seems like the recent "import" of a new version of the "Oniguruma code" is the direct cause. Are there inherent problems with import? Or was the import not done the way it is supposed to be done in CVS? /Johan Holmberg