[#3682] x86_64 -- warning and errors — ts <decoux@...>
4 messages
2004/11/02
[#3687] lib/ostruct.rb 1.12 - wrong commit? — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...>
The above mentioned commit makes OpenStructs into singletons, which
4 messages
2004/11/04
[#3694] Ruby 1.8.2 preview3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello,
10 messages
2004/11/07
[#3696] Re: Ruby 1.8.2 preview3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2004/11/08
[#3711] Converting nil to NULL — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
5 messages
2004/11/11
[#3716] possible bug in method dictionary — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>
NOTE: to repro this bug as written, you must have RubyInline 3.1.0
6 messages
2004/11/12
[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
15 messages
2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/16
Hi --
[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/16
Hi,
[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/16
Hi --
[#3819] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2004/11/25
Hi --
[#3821] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
2004/11/25
On Thursday, November 25, 2004, 10:55:53 PM, David wrote:
[#3825] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/25
Hi,
[#3733] Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
9 messages
2004/11/15
[#3734] Re: Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/15
Hi,
[#3735] Re: Core dump with latest Ruby from CVS
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2004/11/15
[#3756] Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
I'm having some very strange build problems on Windows, and thought
4 messages
2004/11/17
[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/23
[#3789] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/23
Hi,
[#3790] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/23
[#3791] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/11/23
>>>>> "J" == Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:
[#3792] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/23
Hi,
[#3806] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — noreply@...
Bugs item #1095, was opened at 2004-11-24 16:48
3 messages
2004/11/24
[#3809] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — noreply@...
Bugs item #1107, was opened at 2004-11-24 15:25
6 messages
2004/11/24
[#3810] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/11/24
Hi,
[#3812] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/25
[#3814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3.
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/11/25
[#3842] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Moin!
6 messages
2004/11/28
[#3843] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2004/11/28
Hi,
[#3846] REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I found this oddity while running ParseTree over every .rb file in the
6 messages
2004/11/29
Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()
From:
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date:
2004-11-28 23:23:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #3845
Hi,
In message "Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()"
on Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:01:01 +0900, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes:
|> I think so. My opinion is that "respond_to?" of proxy object should
|> be overridden to delegate unknown method names to the remote object,
|> when method_missing is used extensively.
|
|This sounds good -- so convert_type() should basically use
|RTEST(rb_funcall(val, rb_intern("respond_to?"), 1, ID2SYM(m))) instead
|of directly using rb_respond_to?
Wait, I have forgotten one factor: performance.
I just remembered that I wanted to avoid capturing exception by using
rb_respond_to(). Since rb_funcall() is much slower than capturing,
I'd call "to_ary" directly.
respond_to? method should check remote object anyway.
matz.