[#3726] Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

15 messages 2004/11/12
[#3749] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3751] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/16

Hi,

[#3752] Re: Fixnum#clone and Float#clone raise different exceptions — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/11/16

Hi --

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23
[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

Re: possible bug in method dictionary

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2004-11-12 20:46:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #3722
Hi,

At Sat, 13 Nov 2004 05:33:45 +0900,
Ryan Davis wrote in [ruby-core:03720]:
> OK. I think I have a more clarified issue now. Thank you very much Nobu 
> for forcing me to look at this w/o inline. The key difference between 
> what your version does and what inline does is in classes vs modules. 
> Inline defines modules and then mixes them in with include. Maybe 
> Inline shouldn't do that anymore, I dunno. It turns out that C 
> extensions aren't even necessary to show what I am talking about. For 
> example:

Mixed-in methods can't override the methods defined in the
including class.  The included module is a superclass of it
actually.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread