ruby-core

When I run a ruby program for a long time, it sometimes gives segmentation fault. I've tried the stable version 1.8.1 and all the development versions. When I compile the source code it gaves segmentation fault when running a program for a long time, but running with the ruby rpm package from fedora core 2, it runs perfectly for a long time without giving seg fault. Is there some especial way to configure the compilation? Somebody knowns what I 'm talking about? :P

1 message 2004/11/16

[#3755] Regexp: compile error vs. exception — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/11/16

[#3757] Re: Regexp: compile error vs. exception — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/17

Hi,

[#3756] Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

I'm having some very strange build problems on Windows, and thought

4 messages 2004/11/17

[#3759] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/11/17

Hello,

[#3761] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/11/17

On Nov 16, 2004, at 22:48, U.Nakamura wrote:

[#3763] Re: Windows build problems (1.8.2preview3) — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/11/18

Hello.

[#3762] x.include? speed observation — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I wondered about implementing a fairly small set of present/absent flags and

1 message 2004/11/17

[#3765] Readline.completion_append_character in latest snapshot — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

In ruby 1.9.0 (2004-11-18) [i686-linux], something changed in readline,

2 messages 2004/11/19

[#3767] Re: [BUG] Readline.completion_append_character in latest snapshot — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/11/19

Hi,

[#3766] Make READ_DATA_PENDING use __fpending() if available — noreply@...

Patches item #1074, was opened at 2004-11-18 16:20

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3768] rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

% rdoc -1

4 messages 2004/11/19

[#3776] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/20

[#3778] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/11/20

[#3781] Re: rdoc -1 tries to eat my files — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/20

[#3769] Forwardable warnings — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3770] OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2004/11/19

[#3772] Re: OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — James Britt <ruby@...> 2004/11/19

Lothar Scholz wrote:

[#3775] Re: OT: Book about compiler (parser) design — David Ross <dross@...> 2004/11/19

James Britt wrote:

[#3771] Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/11/19

[#3779] Re: Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3780] Re: Bug in IO#gets("") in 1.9 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3773] mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

Would it make sense to have $LOCAL_LIBS as a dependency for the DLLIB

1 message 2004/11/19

[#3774] Nicer traceback at Interrupt — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/11/19

[#3777] Re: [PATCH] Nicer traceback at Interrupt — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/20

Hi,

[#3782] RDoc and requires — noreply@...

Bugs item #1083, was opened at 2004-11-22 14:51

1 message 2004/11/22

[#3783] Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2004/11/22

[#3794] Re: Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/11/23

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 10:55, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#3797] Re: Rubyforge Ruby project enhancment — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/11/23

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:27, Tom Copeland wrote:

[#3784] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — noreply@...

Bugs item #1084, was opened at 2004-11-22 23:21

1 message 2004/11/22

[#3785] The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/11/23

[#3787] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3788] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3789] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3820] Re: ruby -y — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/25

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3822] Re: ruby -y — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3823] Re: ruby -y — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/25

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3790] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/23

[#3791] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "J" == Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:

[#3792] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3795] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3793] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — ts <decoux@...> 2004/11/23

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#3796] Re: The latest 1.8.2 cvs prints parse error when starting extension compiling — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/23

Hi,

[#3786] Please commit erb.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2004/11/23

[#3802] Re: Please commit erb.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/11/24

On Tuesday, November 23, 2004, 6:55:06 PM, Gavin wrote:

[#3813] Re: Please commit erb.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3798] Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — Christian Reiniger <creinig@...>

Following code:

3 messages 2004/11/23

[#3803] Re: Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3804] Re: Possible Bug: Running thread blocks access to /proc/loadavg — Christian Reiniger <creinig@...> 2004/11/24

On Wednesday 24 November 2004 12:13, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#3800] autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

4 messages 2004/11/24

[#3801] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3805] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/24

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3808] Re: autoconf >= 2.53 ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3806] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — noreply@...

Bugs item #1095, was opened at 2004-11-24 16:48

3 messages 2004/11/24

[#3807] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1095 ] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3811] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1095 ] current ruby 1.8.2 cvs has inconsistent string handling (null char in string error) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3809] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — noreply@...

Bugs item #1107, was opened at 2004-11-24 15:25

6 messages 2004/11/24

[#3810] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/24

Hi,

[#3812] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/25

[#3814] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/11/25

[#3816] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/11/25

In article <Pine.GSO.4.61.0411250838140.6746@pjakkur.iar.se>,

[#3818] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1107 ] Ruby does not compile on Red Hat Entreprise Linux 3. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/25

Hi,

[#3824] CVS/CIA — David Ross <dross@...>

Greetings everyone civil,

1 message 2004/11/25

[#3831] File::Stat#blksize for Win32 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/11/27

[#3832] CGI::Session invokes nonexistent method — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

In the current HEAD and in the ruby_1.8 branch, CGI::Session tries to

2 messages 2004/11/27

[#3834] Re: CGI::Session invokes nonexistent method — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/27

Hi,

[#3836] Segmentation fault with StringIO#puts and StringIO#rewind — noreply@...

Bugs item #1120, was opened at 2004-11-27 08:37

2 messages 2004/11/27

[#3847] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1120 ] Segmentation fault with StringIO#puts and StringIO#rewind — nobu.nokada@... 2004/11/29

Hi,

[#3838] RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

4 messages 2004/11/27

[#3854] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2004/11/29

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 08:26:06AM +0900, Florian Growrote:

[#3839] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...> 2004/11/27

On Saturday 27 November 2004 06:26 pm, Florian Groß wrote:

[#3840] Re: RFE: Kernel#set_trace_func — Florian Groß <florgro@...> 2004/11/27

trans. (T. Onoma) wrote:

[#3841] Creating a NoOp Node for 'end' statements — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello ruby-core,

1 message 2004/11/28

[#3842] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Moin!

6 messages 2004/11/28

[#3843] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/28

Hi,

[#3844] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3845] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/28

Hi,

[#3849] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3855] Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/11/29

Hi,

[#3846] REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I found this oddity while running ParseTree over every .rb file in the

6 messages 2004/11/29

[#3851] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#3857] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/11/30

[#3858] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/30

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:53:38 +0900, Ryan Davis <ryand@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#3859] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/30

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#3864] Re: REXML::Functions.name == nil — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/12/02

On Monday 29 November 2004 20:14, Florian Growrote:

[#3848] Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

C:\home>ri Object#singleton_method_added

4 messages 2004/11/29

[#3852] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/11/29

[#3853] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/11/29

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:40:48 +0900, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#3850] Re: Bug with ri Object#singleton_method_added — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/11/29

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#3856] define_method / super — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2004/11/29

[#3860] Wrong test for xmlrpc — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

2 messages 2004/11/30

[#3865] Re: Wrong test for xmlrpc — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/12/02

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()

From: Florian Gro<florgro@...>

Date: 2004-11-28 15:01:01 UTC

List: ruby-core #3844

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> In message "Re: [BUG?] convert_type() uses rb_respond_to()"
>     on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:23:44 +0900, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> |I just had a bit of trouble after trying to do proxied_ary | proxied_ary 
> |where proxied_ary were two Arrays behind a DRbObject proxy. DRbObjects 
> |don't define .to_ary by themself, but they have a method_missing() hook 
> |that will forward the calls over the network. So I wonder if it would 
> |not be a better idea to just call the method and to see if that causes a 
> |NoMethodError exception. At least that is how I would expect it to behave...
> |
> |Does this make sense?
> 
> I think so.  My opinion is that "respond_to?" of proxy object should
> be overridden to delegate unknown method names to the remote object,
> when method_missing is used extensively.

This sounds good -- so convert_type() should basically use 
RTEST(rb_funcall(val, rb_intern("respond_to?"), 1, ID2SYM(m))) instead 
of directly using rb_respond_to?

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next