From: Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>
Date: 2011-06-28T23:28:50+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:37634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3351] stack overflow on super


Issue #3351 has been updated by Yura Sokolov.


I had catched by this with rails/sequel/custom backend for delayed_jobs.
After figuring, I ought to do some manipulations with requiring my initializators, and that looks ugly a bit.

----------------------------------------
Bug #3351: stack overflow on super
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/3351

Author: Serge Balyuk
Status: Assigned
Priority: Low
Assignee: Koichi Sasada
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-05-26 trunk 28028) [i686-linux]


=begin
 It looks like `super` behavior is a bit different in 1.8 and 1.9. Please find the example below:
 
 class Base
   def foo
     puts "bar"
   end
 end
 
 module Override
   def foo
     puts "override"
     super
   end
 end
 
 
 class A < Base
 end
 
 class B < A
 end
 
 B.send(:include, Override)
 A.send(:include, Override)
 
 B.new.foo
 
 ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux] output:
 
 
 override
 override
 bar
 
 
 and ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-05-26 trunk 28028) [i686-linux] output:
 
 ....
 override
 override
 override
 override
 override
 super.rb:9: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
 
 
 Hope that helps.
=end



-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org