[#36679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4814][Open] minitest 2.2.x and test/unit do not get along — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
9 messages
2011/06/01
[#36707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4818][Open] Add method marshalable? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
5 messages
2011/06/03
[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>
22 messages
2011/06/03
[#36714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4822][Open] String#capitalize improvements — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
8 messages
2011/06/03
[#36720] Direct modifications to RubyGems in trunk? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
4 messages
2011/06/03
[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
56 messages
2011/06/04
[#36900] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Cezary Baginski <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/06/09
[#36902] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rocky Bernstein <rocky@...>
2011/06/09
[#36935] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/06/10
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:20:32AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#36957] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
2011/06/11
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cezary <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote:
[#37089] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/06/13
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:20:31AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#36732] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/04
[#36758] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
2011/06/05
[#36784] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/06/06
[#36833] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/08
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
[#36741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4828][Open] crash in test_thread_instance_variable — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
8 messages
2011/06/05
[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
24 messages
2011/06/05
[#36907] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators
— Jan Lelis <mail@...>
2011/06/10
[#36764] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4831][Open] Integer#prime_factors — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
5 messages
2011/06/05
[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
53 messages
2011/06/06
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/06/07
Hello,
[#36830] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/08
Hi,
[#46648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2012/07/23
[#46667] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/07/23
Em 23-07-2012 10:12, mame (Yusuke Endoh) escreveu:
[#36786] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
2011/06/06
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#36804] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
2011/06/06
On 07/06/2011, at 12:18 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
[#46673] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
2012/07/23
[#46701] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/07/24
(2012/07/24 0:44), alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov) wrote:
[#54874] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
2013/05/09
[#36787] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4841][Open] WEBrick threading leads to infinite loop — Peak Xu <peak.xu+ruby@...>
8 messages
2011/06/06
[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
11 messages
2011/06/06
[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
10 messages
2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/08
Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/09
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#36878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/09
Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hi,
16 messages
2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/08
Hi,
[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/06/09
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#36876] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/09
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Aaron Patterson
[#36877] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/06/09
Hi,
[#36911] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/10
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#36914] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/06/10
Hi,
[#36939] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/06/10
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
12 messages
2011/06/12
[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
10 messages
2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/13
> Hello all.
[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/13
> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/13
> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
[#37128] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/14
> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
[#37137] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/14
> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
[#37182] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/16
> My feedback was specific to the suggestion of embedding links into the Ruby source tree, not the issue of whether more documentation is needed. For the tutorials scenario you raised, I believe links from http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ (e.g. - a new Tutorials section) are a more adaptable and maintainable _implementation_ for dealing with documentation realities than links in source.
[#37139] [Bug: ruby-1.9] test-all on without openssl system — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2011/06/14
[#37144] Ruby 1.8.6 status — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Hi.
6 messages
2011/06/14
[#37274] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 status
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2011/06/21
[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>
30 messages
2011/06/16
[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
61 messages
2011/06/16
[#37192] rb_w32_add_socket / rb_w32_remove_socket — ghazel@...
Hello,
3 messages
2011/06/17
[#37206] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4896][Open] Add newpad() support to Curses — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
6 messages
2011/06/17
[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>
43 messages
2011/06/17
[#77620] [Ruby trunk Feature#4897] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/
— nobu@...
2016/10/14
Issue #4897 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#37217] coerce — Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
Hello
8 messages
2011/06/18
[#37256] Re: coerce
— Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
2011/06/21
2011/6/18 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
[#37260] Re: coerce
— Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
2011/06/21
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:06:05PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
[#37261] Re: coerce
— Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
2011/06/21
2011/6/21 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
[#37265] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Anthony Crognale" <anthony@...>
mget last:10 mp
3 messages
2011/06/21
[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
9 messages
2011/06/22
[#37288] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4917][Open] NilClass#to_ary — Jay Feldblum <y_feldblum@...>
8 messages
2011/06/22
[#37298] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4917][Rejected] NilClass#to_ary
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/06/22
[#37289] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4918][Assigned] Make all core tests inherit from Test::Unit::TestCase — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
4 messages
2011/06/22
[#37336] I have imported Rake 0.9.2 to trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I asked Jim if he would like me to import rake 0.9.2 to trunk, so I have.
4 messages
2011/06/23
[#37401] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3784] Seg fault in webrick — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
1 message
2011/06/26
[#37463] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4480][Assigned] Thread-local variables issue: Thread#[] returns nil when called first time — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
3 messages
2011/06/26
[#37546] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4934][Open] winsock listen backlog may only be set once, and is set to 5 — Greg Hazel <ghazel@...>
6 messages
2011/06/26
[#37551] [ANN] Ruby Weekly Report — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2011/06/26
[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
13 messages
2011/06/27
[#37588] CI? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is this an official CI for ruby?
7 messages
2011/06/27
[#37590] Re: CI?
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/06/27
(2011/06/28 6:28), Ryan Davis wrote:
[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
25 messages
2011/06/28
[ruby-core:37391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3586][Closed] Using Nokogiri-1.4.2 with ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-06 revision 28549) and Rails3.beta4
From:
Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Date:
2011-06-26 06:02:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #37391
Issue #3586 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. Status changed from Open to Closed ---------------------------------------- Bug #3586: Using Nokogiri-1.4.2 with ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-06 revision 28549) and Rails3.beta4 http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/3586 Author: TJ Koblentz Status: Closed Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-06 revision 28549) [x86_64-darwin10.2.0] =begin This error occurs when I start the local rails server. I saw an error similar to this regarding Nokogiri mentioning this was a ruby problem, although I'm unsure. I apologize if it isn't. === CONSOLE OUTPUT === project tjk$ rails server /Users/tjk/Desktop/project/mysql/gems/nokogiri-1.4.2/lib/nokogiri/nokogiri.bundle: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-07-06 revision 28549) [x86_64-darwin10.2.0] -- control frame ---------- c:0030 p:-542383754 s:0093 b:0093 l:000092 d:000092 TOP c:0029 p:---- s:0091 b:0091 l:000090 d:000090 CFUNC :require c:0028 p:0012 s:0087 b:0087 l:000070 d:000086 BLOCK /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:212 c:0027 p:0005 s:0085 b:0085 l:000075 d:000084 BLOCK /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:198 c:0026 p:0046 s:0083 b:0083 l:000082 d:000082 METHOD /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:554 c:0025 p:0041 s:0076 b:0076 l:000075 d:000075 METHOD /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:198 c:0024 p:0013 s:0071 b:0071 l:000070 d:000070 METHOD /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:212 c:0023 p:0186 s:0066 b:0066 l:000065 d:000065 TOP /Users/tjk/Desktop/project/mysql/gems/nokogiri-1.4.2/lib/nokogiri.rb:13 c:0022 p:---- s:0064 b:0064 l:000063 d:000063 FINISH c:0021 p:---- s:0062 b:0062 l:000061 d:000061 CFUNC :require c:0020 p:0047 s:0058 b:0058 l:000040 d:000057 BLOCK /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:46 c:0019 p:---- s:0054 b:0054 l:000053 d:000053 FINISH c:0018 p:---- s:0052 b:0052 l:000051 d:000051 CFUNC :each c:0017 p:0026 s:0049 b:0049 l:000040 d:000048 BLOCK /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:41 c:0016 p:---- s:0046 b:0046 l:000045 d:000045 FINISH c:0015 p:---- s:0044 b:0044 l:000043 d:000043 CFUNC :each c:0014 p:0052 s:0041 b:0041 l:000040 d:000040 METHOD /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:40 c:0013 p:0021 s:0036 b:0036 l:000035 d:000035 METHOD /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler.rb:89 c:0012 p:0079 s:0032 b:0032 l:000031 d:000031 TOP /Users/tjk/Desktop/project/config/application.rb:7 c:0011 p:---- s:0030 b:0030 l:000029 d:000029 FINISH c:0010 p:---- s:0028 b:0028 l:000027 d:000027 CFUNC :require c:0009 p:0016 s:0024 b:0024 l:000015 d:000023 BLOCK /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:28 c:0008 p:---- s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 FINISH c:0007 p:---- s:0019 b:0019 l:000018 d:000018 CFUNC :tap c:0006 p:0456 s:0016 b:0016 l:000015 d:000015 TOP /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:27 c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0010 l:000009 d:000009 CFUNC :require c:0003 p:0061 s:0006 b:0006 l:001588 d:002448 EVAL script/rails:6 c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:001588 d:001588 TOP --------------------------- -- Ruby level backtrace information ---------------------------------------- script/rails:6:in `<main>' script/rails:6:in `require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:27:in `<top (required)>' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:27:in `tap' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:28:in `block in <top (required)>' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta4/lib/rails/commands.rb:28:in `require' /Users/tjk/Desktop/project/config/application.rb:7:in `<top (required)>' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler.rb:89:in `gem_require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:40:in `require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:40:in `each' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:41:in `block in require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:41:in `each' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:46:in `block (2 levels) in require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:46:in `require' /Users/tjk/Desktop/project/mysql/gems/nokogiri-1.4.2/lib/nokogiri.rb:13:in `<top (required)>' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:212:in `require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:198:in `load_dependency' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:554:in `new_constants_in' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:198:in `block in load_dependency' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:212:in `block in require' /Users/tjk/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-head/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta4/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:212:in `require' -- C level backtrace information ------------------------------------------- [NOTE] You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries. Bug reports are welcome. For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html Abort trap =end -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org