[#36679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4814][Open] minitest 2.2.x and test/unit do not get along — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
[#36707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4818][Open] Add method marshalable? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>
[#36714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4822][Open] String#capitalize improvements — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
[#36720] Direct modifications to RubyGems in trunk? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:20:32AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cezary <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:20:31AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
[#36741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4828][Open] crash in test_thread_instance_variable — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36764] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4831][Open] Integer#prime_factors — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Hello,
Hi,
Em 23-07-2012 10:12, mame (Yusuke Endoh) escreveu:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
On 07/06/2011, at 12:18 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
(2012/07/24 0:44), alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov) wrote:
[#36787] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4841][Open] WEBrick threading leads to infinite loop — Peak Xu <peak.xu+ruby@...>
[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Aaron Patterson
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
> Hello all.
> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
> My feedback was specific to the suggestion of embedding links into the Ruby source tree, not the issue of whether more documentation is needed. For the tutorials scenario you raised, I believe links from http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ (e.g. - a new Tutorials section) are a more adaptable and maintainable _implementation_ for dealing with documentation realities than links in source.
[#37139] [Bug: ruby-1.9] test-all on without openssl system — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#37144] Ruby 1.8.6 status — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Hi.
[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>
[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#37192] rb_w32_add_socket / rb_w32_remove_socket — ghazel@...
Hello,
[#37206] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4896][Open] Add newpad() support to Curses — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>
Issue #4897 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#37217] coerce — Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
Hello
2011/6/18 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:06:05PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
2011/6/21 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
[#37265] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Anthony Crognale" <anthony@...>
mget last:10 mp
[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#37288] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4917][Open] NilClass#to_ary — Jay Feldblum <y_feldblum@...>
[#37289] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4918][Assigned] Make all core tests inherit from Test::Unit::TestCase — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#37336] I have imported Rake 0.9.2 to trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I asked Jim if he would like me to import rake 0.9.2 to trunk, so I have.
[#37401] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3784] Seg fault in webrick — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
[#37463] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4480][Assigned] Thread-local variables issue: Thread#[] returns nil when called first time — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
[#37546] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4934][Open] winsock listen backlog may only be set once, and is set to 5 — Greg Hazel <ghazel@...>
[#37551] [ANN] Ruby Weekly Report — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...>
Hi,
[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
[#37588] CI? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is this an official CI for ruby?
(2011/06/28 6:28), Ryan Davis wrote:
[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[ruby-core:36879] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
> Interested in the overhead of this EAGAIN nonsense, I ran a quick
> benchmark. I include it here for the amusement of all. It demonstrates
> pretty clearly the impact of the extend(WaitReadable), since that's
> really the only thing that differs between the two (at least in
> JRuby).
Since you provided the benchmark code, I reformatted and
made a version of it for kgio (see below).
Summary: ephemeral-class performance noticeably (and will have
a bigger impact for bigger applications, not small benchmark scripts)
kgio reduces overhead greatly by avoiding exceptions. Real-world
results (see the dalli README) are less impressive, of course, but still
noticeable.
Results below:
== Ruby trunk
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-06-09 trunk 31961) [x86_64-linux]
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.158108)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.156812)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.157045)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.156393)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.156002)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.159343)
0.150000 0.010000 0.160000 ( 0.159755)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.158942)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.158270)
0.150000 0.000000 0.150000 ( 0.158734)
== git clone git://bogomips.org/ruby.git ephemeral-class
ruby 1.9.3dev (2011-06-09 trunk 31961) [x86_64-linux]
loop_eagain (read_nonblock)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.101462)
0.080000 0.010000 0.090000 ( 0.100878)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.100596)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.101341)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.100753)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.099882)
0.090000 0.000000 0.090000 ( 0.100205)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.099895)
0.100000 0.000000 0.100000 ( 0.101218)
0.090000 0.010000 0.100000 ( 0.100429)
loop_wait_readable (Kgio::Socket#kgio_tryread)
0.000000 0.010000 0.010000 ( 0.004570)
0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005165)
0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.004236)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004767)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004186)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004813)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004186)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004755)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004168)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004199)
loop_wait_readable (Kgio::Pipe#kgio_tryread)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.005383)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004787)
0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005284)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004784)
0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005311)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004770)
0.010000 0.000000 0.010000 ( 0.005299)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004811)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.005347)
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.004770)
I added a separate set of tests for Kgio::Pipe vs Kgio::Socket since
Kgio::Socket has a small, Linux-only optimization to avoid fcntl()
syscalls entirely.
# script I used:
# based on one liner by Charles Nutter [ruby-core:36875]
# reformatted and added kgio tests
----------------------- 8< ------------------------
require 'kgio'
require 'benchmark'
def loop_eagain(sock)
i = 0
begin
sock.read_nonblock(1)
rescue Errno::EAGAIN
return if i >= 10_000
i += 1
retry
end
end
def loop_wait_readable(sock)
i = 0
case sock.kgio_tryread(1)
when :wait_readable
return if i >= 10_000
i += 1
when String then break # success
when nil then break # EOF
end while true
end
host = 'yhbt.net' # yhbt.net webmaster is OK with testing against it
puts "loop_eagain (read_nonblock)"
10.times {
sock = TCPSocket.new(host, 80)
puts Benchmark.measure { loop_eagain(sock) }
}
puts "loop_wait_readable (Kgio::Socket#kgio_tryread)"
addr = Socket.pack_sockaddr_in(80, host) # kgio doesn't do DNS lookups
10.times {
sock = Kgio::Socket.new(addr)
puts Benchmark.measure { loop_wait_readable(sock) }
}
puts "loop_wait_readable (Kgio::Pipe#kgio_tryread)"
addr = Socket.pack_sockaddr_in(80, host) # kgio doesn't do DNS lookups
10.times {
r, w = Kgio::Pipe.new
puts Benchmark.measure { loop_wait_readable(r) }
}
------------------------- 8< ------------------------
--
Eric Wong