[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>

22 messages 2011/06/03

[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

56 messages 2011/06/04

[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

24 messages 2011/06/05

[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

53 messages 2011/06/06
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/06/07

Hello,

[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/06/06

[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

10 messages 2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/08

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:

[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/08

Hi,

[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/09

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

12 messages 2011/06/12

[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

10 messages 2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> Hello all.

[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/13

> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37128] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/14

> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.

[#37137] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/14

> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.

[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

30 messages 2011/06/16

[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

61 messages 2011/06/16

[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>

43 messages 2011/06/17

[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>

9 messages 2011/06/22

[#37324] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4923][Open] [ext/openssl] test_ssl.rb: test_client_auth fails — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

19 messages 2011/06/23

[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

13 messages 2011/06/27

[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

25 messages 2011/06/28

[ruby-core:37171] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model

From: Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Date: 2011-06-16 16:00:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #37171
How exactly do you expect this to work? If the string literal is supposed to
be created with String.new(), what do we pass to String.new()? If we pass a
simple string (that is, a string which hasn't gone through String.new()),
these two behave different:

  "Hello World"  # => Calls String.new() with a simple string and returns a
full string
  String.new("Hello World") # => Calls String.new() with string literal (a
full string) and returns a full string

Beside, I don't see how this breaks the object model. The object model
doesn't state that all created strings must be created through String.new.
In fact, it's possible to side-step the initialization in pure Ruby
too: String.allocate.replace("Hello").

// Magnus Holm


On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 17:46, Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

>
> Issue #4893 has been reported by Lazaridis Ilias.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #4893: Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4893
>
> Author: Lazaridis Ilias
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:
> Category:
> Target version:
> ruby -v: 1.9.2
>
>
>
> #String2.rb
> class String
>  def initialize(val)
>    self.replace(val)
>    puts object_id
>  end
>  def my_method_test
>    'has method <my_method_test>'
>  end
> end
>
> # command line
> $ irb
> irb(main):001:0> original = String.new("original")
> => "original"
> irb(main):002:0> load "String2.rb"
> => true
> irb(main):003:0> altered = String.new("altered")
> 21878604
> => "altered"
> irb(main):004:0> altered.my_method_test
> => "has method <my_method_test>"
> irb(main):005:0> literal = "literal"
> => "literal"
> irb(main):006:0> literal.my_method_test
> => "has method <my_method_test>"
> irb(main):007:0>
>
> -
>
> The initialize method is an integral part of the class String.
> From the moment that "String2.rb" is loaded, the initialize method of
> class String has been validly redefined.
>
> (The behaviour of the String class within the "irb session" is
> altered)
>
> The altered initialize method is now an integral part of the class
> String.
>
> The altered String object behaves as expected (responds to
> "my_method_test, initialized via redefined initialize method).
>
> The String(Literal) object responds to "my_method_test", but it is was
> not initialized with the redefined initialize method.
>
> -
>
> The "Literal Instantiation" calls the original (core-C-level) String
> initialize method instead of the redefined one (user-language-level).
> This *breaks* the object model.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>
>

In This Thread