[#36679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4814][Open] minitest 2.2.x and test/unit do not get along — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
[#36707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4818][Open] Add method marshalable? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>
[#36714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4822][Open] String#capitalize improvements — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
[#36720] Direct modifications to RubyGems in trunk? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:20:32AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cezary <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:20:31AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
[#36741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4828][Open] crash in test_thread_instance_variable — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36764] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4831][Open] Integer#prime_factors — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Hello,
Hi,
Em 23-07-2012 10:12, mame (Yusuke Endoh) escreveu:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
On 07/06/2011, at 12:18 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
(2012/07/24 0:44), alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov) wrote:
[#36787] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4841][Open] WEBrick threading leads to infinite loop — Peak Xu <peak.xu+ruby@...>
[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Aaron Patterson
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
> Hello all.
> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.
> My feedback was specific to the suggestion of embedding links into the Ruby source tree, not the issue of whether more documentation is needed. For the tutorials scenario you raised, I believe links from http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ (e.g. - a new Tutorials section) are a more adaptable and maintainable _implementation_ for dealing with documentation realities than links in source.
[#37139] [Bug: ruby-1.9] test-all on without openssl system — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#37144] Ruby 1.8.6 status — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Hi.
[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>
[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#37192] rb_w32_add_socket / rb_w32_remove_socket — ghazel@...
Hello,
[#37206] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4896][Open] Add newpad() support to Curses — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>
Issue #4897 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#37217] coerce — Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
Hello
2011/6/18 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:06:05PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
2011/6/21 Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz>:
[#37265] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Anthony Crognale" <anthony@...>
mget last:10 mp
[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#37288] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4917][Open] NilClass#to_ary — Jay Feldblum <y_feldblum@...>
[#37289] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4918][Assigned] Make all core tests inherit from Test::Unit::TestCase — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#37336] I have imported Rake 0.9.2 to trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
I asked Jim if he would like me to import rake 0.9.2 to trunk, so I have.
[#37401] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3784] Seg fault in webrick — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
[#37463] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4480][Assigned] Thread-local variables issue: Thread#[] returns nil when called first time — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
[#37546] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4934][Open] winsock listen backlog may only be set once, and is set to 5 — Greg Hazel <ghazel@...>
[#37551] [ANN] Ruby Weekly Report — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...>
Hi,
[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
[#37588] CI? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is this an official CI for ruby?
(2011/06/28 6:28), Ryan Davis wrote:
[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[ruby-core:36950] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
Hi, James Gray wrote: > > Do we have any idea if $SAFE is actually used? > > I worry that people who find themselves needing that much security are > forced to skip over $SAFE and use more robust options. I admit that I'm > totally guessing about that though. We use $SAFE = 4 to create a sandbox for the execution of semi-trusted scripts, conforming to our application's plug-in API. "Semi-trusted" meaning of third-party origin, but not intentionally malicious. (I wouldn't bet anything valuable that our $SAFE = 4 sandbox could contain a maliciously coded script intent on breaking out of it.) The specific case we're guarding against is a well-intentioned but buggy third-party plug-in, which, when installed by one of our users and executed by our application, might end up destroying data on the user's filesystem. The $SAFE = 4 sandbox only allows I/O through our plug-in API, which restricts I/O to only the set of subdirectories and/or files that are pertinent to the operation being requested of the plug-in. * * * Note, I'm not particularly wedded to the $SAFE security model. (I have used $SAFE = 1 in a few web/CGI scripts.) What I'd really like is a mechanism in ruby that would provide a secure sandbox that could contain completely untrusted code. Regards, Bill