[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>

22 messages 2011/06/03

[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

56 messages 2011/06/04

[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

24 messages 2011/06/05

[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

53 messages 2011/06/06
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/06/07

Hello,

[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/06/06

[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

10 messages 2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/08

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:

[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/08

Hi,

[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/09

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

12 messages 2011/06/12

[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

10 messages 2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> Hello all.

[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/13

> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37128] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/14

> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.

[#37137] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/14

> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connection from rdoc/yard could be, say, mixing with existing ruby-doc.org and rubydoc.info. ut I question embedding source links to info in which the info can easily grow outdated or abandoned as time passes. I also question the ongoing maintenance burdens.

[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

30 messages 2011/06/16

[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

61 messages 2011/06/16

[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>

43 messages 2011/06/17

[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>

9 messages 2011/06/22

[#37324] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4923][Open] [ext/openssl] test_ssl.rb: test_client_auth fails — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

19 messages 2011/06/23

[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

13 messages 2011/06/27

[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

25 messages 2011/06/28

[ruby-core:36815] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require

From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Date: 2011-06-07 11:15:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #36815
Em 07-06-2011 07:10, Yusuke ENDOH escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> 2011/6/6 Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<rr.rosas@gmail.com>:
>> I have a situation where there is some code in Gitorious like:
>>
>> unless defined? GitoriousConfig
>>   # tons of lines here
>> end
>>
>> And I would it to look like
>>
>> return if defined? GitoriousConfig
>>
>> #tons of lines here
>>
>> It would be great to allow return from a required file or some other keyword (break, etc or a new one)
>
> Agreed.  It would be also useful to write platform-specific code:
>
>    require "test/unit"
>
>    return unless /mswin|cygwin|mingw|bccwin/ =~ RUBY_PLATFORM
>
>    class TestForWindowsEnv<  Test::Unit::TestCase
>    ...
>
>
> Here is an experimental patch:
>
>
> diff --git a/compile.c b/compile.c
> index 10d63bc..7b9c490 100644
> --- a/compile.c
> +++ b/compile.c
> @@ -4291,10 +4291,6 @@ iseq_compile_each(rb_iseq_t *iseq, LINK_ANCHOR
> *ret, NODE * node, int poped)
>   	rb_iseq_t *is = iseq;
>
>   	if (is) {
> -	    if (is->type == ISEQ_TYPE_TOP) {
> -		COMPILE_ERROR((ERROR_ARGS "Invalid return"));
> -	    }
> -	    else {
>   		LABEL *splabel = 0;
>
>   		if (is->type == ISEQ_TYPE_METHOD) {
> @@ -4321,7 +4317,6 @@ iseq_compile_each(rb_iseq_t *iseq, LINK_ANCHOR
> *ret, NODE * node, int poped)
>   			ADD_INSN(ret, nd_line(node), pop);
>   		    }
>   		}
> -	    }
>   	}
>   	break;
>         }
> diff --git a/vm_insnhelper.c b/vm_insnhelper.c
> index f40dfdf..274f45d 100644
> --- a/vm_insnhelper.c
> +++ b/vm_insnhelper.c
> @@ -1561,8 +1561,6 @@ vm_throw(rb_thread_t *th, rb_control_frame_t *reg_cfp,
>   		    cfp = RUBY_VM_PREVIOUS_CONTROL_FRAME(cfp);
>   		}
>
> -		rb_vm_localjump_error("unexpected return", throwobj, TAG_RETURN);
> -
>   	      valid_return:
>   		pt = dfp;
>   	    }
>

This patch is so small, that it seems strange that it affects only 
requires... Won't it have side effects? Notice that I didn't test it yet.

I agree with you about specific-platform tests use case too.

Thanks for your interest,

Rodrigo.


In This Thread