[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>

22 messages 2011/06/03

[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

56 messages 2011/06/04

[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

24 messages 2011/06/05

[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

53 messages 2011/06/06
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/06/07

Hello,

[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

11 messages 2011/06/06

[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

10 messages 2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/08

Charles Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:

[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/08

Hi,

[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/09

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

12 messages 2011/06/12

[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

10 messages 2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> Hello all.

[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/06/13

> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/06/13

> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.

[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

30 messages 2011/06/16

[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

61 messages 2011/06/16

[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>

43 messages 2011/06/17

[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>

9 messages 2011/06/22

[#37324] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4923][Open] [ext/openssl] test_ssl.rb: test_client_auth fails — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

19 messages 2011/06/23

[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

13 messages 2011/06/27

[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>

25 messages 2011/06/28

[ruby-core:37683] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #2545] Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break'

From: Dave B <redmine@...>
Date: 2011-06-30 02:46:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #37683
Issue #2545 has been updated by Dave B.


Just met this problem:
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [i386-mingw32]

I'd also consider it a bug and that the ruby implementation should be hidden from the user. Once an element has been selected for deletion, at the end of this iteration, it should be expected to be gone. When using very large arrays, where the programmer knows of a shortcut (e.g. the rest of the array need not be considered), s/he should be encouraged to handle it with 'break'. In testing, I was left wondering whether 'delete_if' was non-destructive, because nothing had changed, and started looking for a bang! method.
To achieve the current behaviour, I only need an Array#dup above the loop.

Thanks to Nobu for working a patch.

daz


----------------------------------------
Bug #2545: Array#delete_if is borked if user calls 'break'
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/2545

Author: Brian Candler
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Category: core
Target version: Ruby 1.8.7
ruby -v: ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [x86_64-linux] 


=begin
 Array is corrupted if you break out of a delete_if { ... } loop. I would expect that the elements already marked as deleted would be deleted, and the remainder of the array would be unchanged.
 
 >> a = [5,6,7,8,9,10]
 => [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
 >> a.delete_if { |x| break if x > 8; x < 7 }
 => nil
 >> a
 => [7, 8, 7, 8, 9, 10]
 
 >> RUBY_VERSION
 => "1.8.7"
 >> RUBY_PATCHLEVEL
 => 174
=end



-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next