[#3006] CVS repository — "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>

Hello.

21 messages 2004/06/16
[#3008] Re: CVS repository — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/16

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <hoaz@gala.net> writes:

[#3009] Re: CVS repository — Michal Rokos <michal@...> 2004/06/16

Hi!

[#3057] Ruby 1.8.2 to be released. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

20 messages 2004/06/23

Re: [Patch] Move all stack info to gc.c

From: Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Date: 2004-06-24 22:28:41 UTC
List: ruby-core #3083
Hello,

On Thursday 24 of June 2004 22:23, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> > |I moved all stack-size info to gc.c
> > |- remove _stklen, since it's not used....
> > |- remove _CRT_glob, ditto
> > |- move _stacksize to gc.c and made it 'unsigned int' (left open -
> > | ie. not 'static')
> > |Or is there any reason not to do this?
> >
> > I don't think so.  Go ahead, or we will know if there's unseen
> > reason.
>
> If it's going to be global, it'd be better to have it start with the
> "rb_" prefix...

I assume you're talking about _stacksize...

well it was non-static int before.... So I left it as it was, but just 
moved to gc.c.

This was done intensionally, because I didn't know whether somebody does 
extern int _stacksize somewhere...

I guess not.

So IMHO it's OK, not to prefix it by rb_, but make it static (as the 
others are)

	Michal

In This Thread