[#3006] CVS repository — "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>

Hello.

21 messages 2004/06/16
[#3008] Re: CVS repository — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/16

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <hoaz@gala.net> writes:

[#3009] Re: CVS repository — Michal Rokos <michal@...> 2004/06/16

Hi!

[#3057] Ruby 1.8.2 to be released. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

20 messages 2004/06/23

Re: CVS repository

From: Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>
Date: 2004-06-16 09:47:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #3019
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 10:39, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: CVS repository"
>     on 04/06/16, Elliott Hughes <ehughes@bluearc.com> writes:
> 
> |not that i disagree about dumping CVS, but you can use cvs2cl.pl
> ("sudo
> |apt-get install cvs2cl" on Debian) to do the equivalent of "svn log"
> for
> |CVS. i use it all the time, for exactly this. it's silly to have
> humans
> |touch the ChangeLog.
> 
> Hmm, we do other way (generating commit log from ChangeLog) using
> pcl-cvs.  Is cvs2cl better?

not by much. as long as you're using a scheme that means you only
manually work on one thing, the only advantage i can see to generating
the ChangeLog from the comments rather than the other way round is that
you don't have ChangeLog as a bogus member of each change set.

-- 
Elliott Hughes, BlueArc Engineering

In This Thread