ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#3113] Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've been trying to use the new RSS library to parse a number of

7 messages 2004/07/01
[#3121] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,
[#3123] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/04

[#3125] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,
[#3129] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/04

[#3143] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/06

Hi,
[#3144] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/06

[#3116] assert_timeout for Test::Unit::Assertions — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirya85@...>

I write subj. Patch in attachment.

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3117] Re: assert_timeout for Test::Unit::Assertions — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3118] SOAP maintainer — "dross@..." <dross@...>

Who maintains SOAP4R? would it be possible to get implementation notes? The

2 messages 2004/07/03
[#3127] Re: SOAP maintainer — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,

[#3119] Re: SOAP maintainer — "dross@..." <dross@...>

I would be delighted to help with the SOAP4R as well, after I finish up

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3130] Base64.encode and Base64.decode — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

A little while ago, the 'base64' methods were sensibly moved into

1 message 2004/07/04

[#3131] reducing Hash in Array — nobu.nokada@...

Moin,

1 message 2004/07/05

[#3136] Wrong rdoc formatting in {array,pack}.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

7 messages 2004/07/05
[#3162] Re: [doc-patch] Wrong rdoc formatting in {array,pack}.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/09

Hello.
[#3170] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/10

[#3172] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/12

Hello.
[#3174] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/12

[#3178] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/13

Hello.
[#3183] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/13

>>- sometimes methods are written as "Array#at" and sometimes as

[#3138] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/07/05
[#3139] Re: [doc] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/05

[#3142] Re: [doc] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/06

[#3141] rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

5 messages 2004/07/06
[#3146] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/07

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 00:23, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3148] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/07

Hi,
[#3151] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/07

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 22:19, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3152] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/07/07

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:26:14AM +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#3150] Array#index with block — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/07

[#3154] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2004/07/08
[#3155] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...> 2004/07/08

Hi,
[#3157] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/07/08

Hello,
[#3182] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...> 2004/07/13

Hi all,

[#3158] Installation of ri when installing 1.8.2 — James Brtt <ruby@...>

The current CVS for 1.8.2 does not install ri unless you either run

2 messages 2004/07/08
[#3160] Re: Installation of ri when installing 1.8.2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/09

On Thursday 08 July 2004 19:15, James Brtt wrote:

[#3159] OT: Request for a Japanese Speaker — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Sorry to intrude for something off-topic, but I've been trying to get

1 message 2004/07/09

[#3161] CVS Head with mingw on Windows — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2004/07/09

[#3163] Looking for reviewers — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

5 messages 2004/07/09
[#3169] Re: Looking for reviewers — "Evan Webb" <evan@...> 2004/07/10

Dave,
[#3164] Re: Looking for reviewers — "Sujith Kumar" <sujithkumar@...> 2004/07/09

Hi Dave,
[#3165] Re: Looking for reviewers — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/09

Hi,
[#3166] Re: Looking for reviewers — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/09

[#3167] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

7 messages 2004/07/09
[#3168] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/09

[#3175] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/12

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3176] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/12

[#3186] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/13

Johan Holmberg wrote:
[#3187] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/13

[#3188] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/13

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#3171] binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/07/12
[#3173] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/12

[#3179] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/13

On Mon 12 Jul 2004 at 21:23:27 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3181] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/13

[#3211] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/19

On Tue 13 Jul 2004 at 21:38:52 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3177] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/12

On Mon 12 Jul 2004 at 21:23:27 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#3180] Contributors: ready for 1.8.2 preview1? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Or do you have anything left for preview1?

1 message 2004/07/13

[#3185] Text folding in YAML — IWATSUKI Hiroyuki <don@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/13

[#3189] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2 — Alvin Schur <schur@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/14
[#3190] Bug in OpenGL module (Re: [Bug] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/14

Hi,
[#3191] Re: Bug in OpenGL module (Re: [Bug] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2) — Alvin Schur <schur@...> 2004/07/14

[#3192] Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

The pad string argument of these methods is undocumented.

3 messages 2004/07/16
[#3194] Re: Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/16

Michael Neumann wrote:
[#3198] Re: Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/16

[#3193] client side imagemap patch (rdoc/diagram.rb) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/16

[#3195] Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/16
[#3196] Re: Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/16

Hi,
[#3197] Re: Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/07/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3199] Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm being silly again, but I can't get \G to work with String.index. If

12 messages 2004/07/16
[#3200] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3203] Re: Trying to understand \G — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3204] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3205] Re: Trying to understand \G — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3206] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3227] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/26

[#3231] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/27

Hi,
[#3201] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/17

[#3202] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3236] Re: Trying to understand \G — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/27

[#3239] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/27

[#3207] lib/.document for 1.8.2 — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...>

I got a request for lib/.document file:

1 message 2004/07/17

[#3208] Ruby doesn't ignore Byte Order Mark when run with -Ku — Florian Groß <florgro@...>

Moin!

2 messages 2004/07/18
[#3215] Re: [BUG] Ruby doesn't ignore Byte Order Mark when run with -Ku — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/20

Hi,

[#3209] Unit tests in the CVS repository — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

I'd like to add the REXML unit tests to Ruby's test framework. Is there an

2 messages 2004/07/19
[#3214] Re: Unit tests in the CVS repository — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/20

Hi,

[#3210] Ruby Specification — David Ross <drossruby@...>

Request. Can someone create a ruby specification? I

1 message 2004/07/19

[#3212] Readable/Writeable modules — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Appended is the patch for RCR 265.

1 message 2004/07/19

[#3213] Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch attempts to create a more consistent style for error

4 messages 2004/07/19
[#3256] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/07/29

Has anybody had a chance to review this patch yet? All the changes are
[#3257] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/30

Hi,
[#3258] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/07/30

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 06:57:56PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3216] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May  2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2004/07/21
[#3221] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 2004 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/07/21

Hi,
[#3222] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/21

On Wednesday 21 July 2004 01:25, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#3217] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 004 — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/21

[#3218] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May  2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/21

On Tuesday 20 July 2004 23:16, daz wrote:
[#3220] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 004 — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/21

[#3219] yaml module feature question about String Tag — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/21
[#3223] Re: yaml module feature question about String Tag — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/07/21

NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#3224] Re: yaml module feature question about String Tag — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/07/21

Hi,

[#3225] Transportation Request — "John Webb" <jwebb@...>

Hi Nita,

1 message 2004/07/22

[#3226] Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/22

[#3228] Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2004/07/27
[#3229] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/27

[#3232] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3233] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/27

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 12:48:07 AM, Luke wrote:
[#3235] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#3237] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/07/27

On 7/27/04 8:21 AM, "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3241] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Richard Kilmer wrote:
[#3244] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/07/28

Luke A. Kanies (luke@madstop.com) wrote:
[#3254] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#3230] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:39:08 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3234] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#3238] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:14:29 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3242] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#3243] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 3:23:46 AM, Austin wrote:
[#3248] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:29:53 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
[#3250] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 9:51:42 PM, Austin wrote:
[#3253] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:00:34 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
[#3255] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/29

On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:44:03 AM, Austin wrote:
[#3249] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:29:53AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#3251] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:50:22 PM, Mauricio wrote:
[#3252] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:13:58PM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#3240] Is this a commit miss? — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

Using the CVS HEAD version with this commit:

2 messages 2004/07/27
[#3246] Re: Is this a commit miss? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/28

Hi,

[#3245] cgi.rb possible memory leak — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

Hi all.

2 messages 2004/07/28
[#3247] Re: cgi.rb possible memory leak — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/28

Hi,

[#3259] Infinite recursion in rdoc — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

2 messages 2004/07/31
[#3260] Re: [PATCH] Infinite recursion in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/31

Re: Reporting RI-documentation corrections ?

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-07-07 13:50:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #3153 
On Jul 7, 2004, at 5:04, Johan Holmberg wrote:
> I want to ask:
> Should it be '->' or '=>' to indicate the return values?
>
> In the current Ruby source (e.g. "array.c") both forms are used.
> Does the difference have any significance, or should all entries
> change to using  '->' ?

It really doesn't matter, but it would probably be nice to be 
consistent. Let's migrate to  -> (because => could be an operator)


Cheers

Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next