[#3228] Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2004/07/27
[#3230] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:39:08 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:

[#3234] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#3238] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:14:29 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:

Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :)

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
Date: 2004-07-04 03:10:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #3121
Hi,

In <D0A4C1A2-CB15-11D8-B645-000A95676A62@pragprog.com>
  "Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :)" on Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:19:20 +0900,
  Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
> I've been trying to use the new RSS library to parse a number of 
> popular blogs. So far, many of them cannot be read, as they fail 
> validation. I've tried ones with RDF 0.91, RSS 1, and RSS 2. (Having 
> said that, Ruby-lang/en/index.rss _does_ parse successfully.)

RSS Parser only supports validation for RSS 1.0. Other
versions of RSS aren't supported because of RSS Parser's
validator can't handle interleave pattern (and I don't like
them.) So validation for RSS 1.0 only supports standard
order RSS. (But RSS 1.0 specification says element order is
not important.)

I'm looking forward to complete RELAX NG validator. :)

--
kou

In This Thread