[#3228] Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2004/07/27
[#3230] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:39:08 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:

[#3234] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#3238] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:14:29 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:

Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc.

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-07-13 18:22:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #3187
On Jul 13, 2004, at 12:40, Florian Growrote:

> A friend of mine who is doing an C(++)-extension bridge between his
> not-so-small C++ library and Ruby doesn't want to clutter up his low
> level code with descriptions of the Ruby interface and would thus be
> able to make good use of this as well.
>
> If there's already suitable workarounds that don't involve creating 
> lots
> of method stubs or if there are any comments about my request I would
> love to hear about them.

You can already do this in 'C' using 'Document-method: and 
Document-class:

They aren't available (yet) for Ruby source. Do you need them for Ruby?


Cheers

Dave



In This Thread