ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#3113] Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've been trying to use the new RSS library to parse a number of

7 messages 2004/07/01
[#3121] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,
[#3123] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/04

[#3125] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,
[#3129] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/04

[#3143] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2004/07/06

Hi,
[#3144] Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/06

[#3116] assert_timeout for Test::Unit::Assertions — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirya85@...>

I write subj. Patch in attachment.

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3117] Re: assert_timeout for Test::Unit::Assertions — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3118] SOAP maintainer — "dross@..." <dross@...>

Who maintains SOAP4R? would it be possible to get implementation notes? The

2 messages 2004/07/03
[#3127] Re: SOAP maintainer — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/07/04

Hi,

[#3119] Re: SOAP maintainer — "dross@..." <dross@...>

I would be delighted to help with the SOAP4R as well, after I finish up

1 message 2004/07/03

[#3130] Base64.encode and Base64.decode — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

A little while ago, the 'base64' methods were sensibly moved into

1 message 2004/07/04

[#3131] reducing Hash in Array — nobu.nokada@...

Moin,

1 message 2004/07/05

[#3136] Wrong rdoc formatting in {array,pack}.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

7 messages 2004/07/05
[#3162] Re: [doc-patch] Wrong rdoc formatting in {array,pack}.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/09

Hello.
[#3170] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/10

[#3172] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/12

Hello.
[#3174] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/12

[#3178] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/13

Hello.
[#3183] Re: [doc-patch] Another rdoc formatting error in array.c — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/07/13

>>- sometimes methods are written as "Array#at" and sometimes as

[#3138] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

3 messages 2004/07/05
[#3139] Re: [doc] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/05

[#3142] Re: [doc] Inconsistent indentation of rdoc entries ? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/06

[#3141] rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

5 messages 2004/07/06
[#3146] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/07

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 00:23, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3148] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/07

Hi,
[#3151] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/07

On Tuesday 06 July 2004 22:19, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#3152] Re: rexml/validation/validationexception is missing. — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2004/07/07

On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:26:14AM +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#3150] Array#index with block — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/07

[#3154] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2004/07/08
[#3155] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...> 2004/07/08

Hi,
[#3157] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/07/08

Hello,
[#3182] Re: UPDATE - [PATCH] Nonblocking socket connect - Win32 - 181 — "Jean-Francois Nadeau" <jean-francois.nadeau@...> 2004/07/13

Hi all,

[#3158] Installation of ri when installing 1.8.2 — James Brtt <ruby@...>

The current CVS for 1.8.2 does not install ri unless you either run

2 messages 2004/07/08
[#3160] Re: Installation of ri when installing 1.8.2 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/09

On Thursday 08 July 2004 19:15, James Brtt wrote:

[#3159] OT: Request for a Japanese Speaker — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Sorry to intrude for something off-topic, but I've been trying to get

1 message 2004/07/09

[#3161] CVS Head with mingw on Windows — Kaspar Schiess <eule@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2004/07/09

[#3163] Looking for reviewers — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

5 messages 2004/07/09
[#3169] Re: Looking for reviewers — "Evan Webb" <evan@...> 2004/07/10

Dave,
[#3164] Re: Looking for reviewers — "Sujith Kumar" <sujithkumar@...> 2004/07/09

Hi Dave,
[#3165] Re: Looking for reviewers — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/09

Hi,
[#3166] Re: Looking for reviewers — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/09

[#3167] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

7 messages 2004/07/09
[#3168] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/09

[#3175] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2004/07/12

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3176] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/12

[#3186] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/13

Johan Holmberg wrote:
[#3187] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/13

[#3188] Re: [doc] Inconsistent "call-seq" usage etc. — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/13

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#3171] binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/07/12
[#3173] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/12

[#3179] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/13

On Mon 12 Jul 2004 at 21:23:27 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3181] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/13

[#3211] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/19

On Tue 13 Jul 2004 at 21:38:52 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3177] Re: binding a URL to a label in RDoc — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/07/12

On Mon 12 Jul 2004 at 21:23:27 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#3180] Contributors: ready for 1.8.2 preview1? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Or do you have anything left for preview1?

1 message 2004/07/13

[#3185] Text folding in YAML — IWATSUKI Hiroyuki <don@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/13

[#3189] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2 — Alvin Schur <schur@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/14
[#3190] Bug in OpenGL module (Re: [Bug] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/14

Hi,
[#3191] Re: Bug in OpenGL module (Re: [Bug] Ruby 1.8.1 and 1.9: interactions between extensions: opengl and imlib2) — Alvin Schur <schur@...> 2004/07/14

[#3192] Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

The pad string argument of these methods is undocumented.

3 messages 2004/07/16
[#3194] Re: Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2004/07/16

Michael Neumann wrote:
[#3198] Re: Documentation fix for String#ljust rjust center — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/16

[#3193] client side imagemap patch (rdoc/diagram.rb) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/16

[#3195] Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/16
[#3196] Re: Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/16

Hi,
[#3197] Re: Patch file.c (dev_minor dev_major) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/07/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3199] Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I'm being silly again, but I can't get \G to work with String.index. If

12 messages 2004/07/16
[#3200] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3203] Re: Trying to understand \G — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3204] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3205] Re: Trying to understand \G — nobu.nokada@... 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3206] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3227] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/26

[#3231] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/27

Hi,
[#3201] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/17

[#3202] Re: Trying to understand \G — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/17

Hi,
[#3236] Re: Trying to understand \G — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/27

[#3239] Re: Trying to understand \G — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/27

[#3207] lib/.document for 1.8.2 — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...>

I got a request for lib/.document file:

1 message 2004/07/17

[#3208] Ruby doesn't ignore Byte Order Mark when run with -Ku — Florian Groß <florgro@...>

Moin!

2 messages 2004/07/18
[#3215] Re: [BUG] Ruby doesn't ignore Byte Order Mark when run with -Ku — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/20

Hi,

[#3209] Unit tests in the CVS repository — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

I'd like to add the REXML unit tests to Ruby's test framework. Is there an

2 messages 2004/07/19
[#3214] Re: Unit tests in the CVS repository — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/20

Hi,

[#3210] Ruby Specification — David Ross <drossruby@...>

Request. Can someone create a ruby specification? I

1 message 2004/07/19

[#3212] Readable/Writeable modules — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Appended is the patch for RCR 265.

1 message 2004/07/19

[#3213] Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...>

The attached patch attempts to create a more consistent style for error

4 messages 2004/07/19
[#3256] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/07/29

Has anybody had a chance to review this patch yet? All the changes are
[#3257] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/30

Hi,
[#3258] Re: Typo and grammar/style fixes for ext/win32ole/win32ole.c — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/07/30

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 06:57:56PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3216] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May  2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2004/07/21
[#3221] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 2004 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2004/07/21

Hi,
[#3222] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/21

On Wednesday 21 July 2004 01:25, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#3217] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 004 — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/21

[#3218] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May  2004 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/07/21

On Tuesday 20 July 2004 23:16, daz wrote:
[#3220] Re: Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org May 004 — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/07/21

[#3219] yaml module feature question about String Tag — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2004/07/21
[#3223] Re: yaml module feature question about String Tag — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/07/21

NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:
[#3224] Re: yaml module feature question about String Tag — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2004/07/21

Hi,

[#3225] Transportation Request — "John Webb" <jwebb@...>

Hi Nita,

1 message 2004/07/22

[#3226] Incident Analysis of the intrusion on helium.ruby-lang.org — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/07/22

[#3228] Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...>

Hi all,

21 messages 2004/07/27
[#3229] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/27

[#3232] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#3233] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/27

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 12:48:07 AM, Luke wrote:
[#3235] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#3237] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/07/27

On 7/27/04 8:21 AM, "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3241] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Richard Kilmer wrote:
[#3244] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/07/28

Luke A. Kanies (luke@madstop.com) wrote:
[#3254] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#3230] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:39:08 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3234] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#3238] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:14:29 +0900, Luke A. Kanies <luke@madstop.com> wrote:
[#3242] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — "Luke A. Kanies" <luke@...> 2004/07/27

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#3243] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 3:23:46 AM, Austin wrote:
[#3248] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:29:53 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
[#3250] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 9:51:42 PM, Austin wrote:
[#3253] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:00:34 +0900, Gavin Sinclair
[#3255] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/29

On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:44:03 AM, Austin wrote:
[#3249] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:29:53AM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#3251] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/07/28

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 10:50:22 PM, Mauricio wrote:
[#3252] Re: Core support for Gems, and namespace — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/07/28

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:13:58PM +0900, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#3240] Is this a commit miss? — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

Using the CVS HEAD version with this commit:

2 messages 2004/07/27
[#3246] Re: Is this a commit miss? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/28

Hi,

[#3245] cgi.rb possible memory leak — Kent Sibilev <ksibilev@...>

Hi all.

2 messages 2004/07/28
[#3247] Re: cgi.rb possible memory leak — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/07/28

Hi,

[#3259] Infinite recursion in rdoc — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

2 messages 2004/07/31
[#3260] Re: [PATCH] Infinite recursion in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/07/31

Re: Problem in RSS library, or problem in my blog :)

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-07-04 13:51:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #3129 
On Jul 4, 2004, at 0:05, Kouhei Sutou wrote:

> Since RSS Parser parses in validation mode by default you
> need explicitly specify non-validation mode.

If I understood your earlier message correctly, your library cannot 
validate 0.9 or 2.0 feeds. It would seem to be reasonable then to have 
the default validation turned off when parsing them. That is, if I 
require rss/0.9, I would expect that your library would by default set 
"validate" to false, as it is incapable of validating these feeds. 
Having it default to a value which s impossible seems like a bug.

Cheers

Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next