[#2968] dbm/gdbm/sdbm etc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Does ext/dbm supersede gdbm and sdbm?
7 messages
2004/06/07
[#2977] Enumerable#each_with_index in "ri" — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
11 messages
2004/06/12
[#3132] Reporting RI-documentation corrections ?
— Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
2004/07/05
[#3133] Re: Reporting RI-documentation corrections ?
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2004/07/05
[#3135] Re: Reporting RI-documentation corrections ?
— Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
2004/07/05
Speaking of ri documentation, is there anywhere that documents the
[#2978] Date.from_time — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Folks,
5 messages
2004/06/13
[#2982] Array#shift(n) — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hello,
15 messages
2004/06/14
[#2985] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/06/14
Hi,
[#2987] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2004/06/14
Hi,
[#2988] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— Michal Rokos <michal@...>
2004/06/14
On Monday 14 of June 2004 16:13, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2989] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2004/06/14
Hi,
[#2991] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— Michal Rokos <michal@...>
2004/06/14
Hello,
[#2998] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— nobu.nokada@...
2004/06/15
Hi,
[#2999] Re: [Patch] Array#shift(n)
— Michal Rokos <michal@...>
2004/06/15
Hello,
[#3006] CVS repository — "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>
Hello.
21 messages
2004/06/16
[#3008] Re: CVS repository
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/06/16
>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <hoaz@gala.net> writes:
[#3009] Re: CVS repository
— Michal Rokos <michal@...>
2004/06/16
Hi!
[#3010] Re: CVS repository
— Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>
2004/06/16
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 09:45, Michal Rokos wrote:
[#3011] Re: CVS repository
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/06/16
>>>>> "M" == Michal Rokos <michal@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#3012] Re: CVS repository
— "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>
2004/06/16
Hello.
[#3027] rb_mod_freeze??? — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hello!
5 messages
2004/06/17
[#3047] Move all stack info to gc.c — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hello,
13 messages
2004/06/23
[#3049] Re: [Patch] Move all stack info to gc.c
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2004/06/23
Hi,
[#3057] Ruby 1.8.2 to be released. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Hi,
20 messages
2004/06/23
[#3060] Re: Ruby 1.8.2 to be released.
— Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
2004/06/23
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#3063] Re: Ruby 1.8.2 to be released.
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2004/06/23
Hi,
[#3090] class= and type checks when casting — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>
Matz, I'm not sure if you followed the discussion in ruby-talk about having a
6 messages
2004/06/25
[#3095] 1.8.2: Segfault — Elven <elven@...>
6 messages
2004/06/26
[#3102] gdbm abort - OSX — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Just before I start another debugging session, has anyone seen this, or
7 messages
2004/06/27
Re: CVS repository
From:
Robert Church <rc@...>
Date:
2004-06-16 23:14:18 UTC
List:
ruby-core #3026
Dave Thomas wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2004, at 7:05, Sean E. Russell wrote: > >> Subversion requires a lot >> less maintenance than CVS > > I'm interested in this statement (as the need to maintain the repository > is the reason I don't recommend SVN to clients right now. Am I wrong in > my belief that SVN requires more server-side maintenance that CVS? I'm with Dave here. SVN requires more maintenance than CVS. SVN requires an occasional 'svnadmin recover' when something gets wedged. CVS, having a stable and simple repository format, simply doesn't have this issue. The worst I've seen is a 'cvs commit' failing, leaving dead lockfiles throughout the repository, but that only happens if the permissions aren't setup properly initially. CVS can also be backed up by simply tarring the repository. SVN requires specialized tools for that. I use and prefer SVN, but it *is* slightly more cumbersome to maintain. I often wish the developers had read Dave's book, the part about the potency of plain text in particular.