From: Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
Date: 2004-06-18T10:25:19+09:00
Subject: Re: Extension which depends on another extension


Please disregard.  This was sent here in error (a follow-up
to ruby-core without my knowledge).


--- Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Mitchell" <quixoticsycophant@yahoo.com>
> > To: "daz" <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk>
> [...]
> > >
> > > Nobu was suggesting the use of rb_funcall.
> > >
> > 
> > You mentioned rb_funcall.  I can't see his mention of it.
> 
> Nobu said: "If I were you, I'd extract common portion to another
> shared library, or define methods instead of direct references."
>                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> In any case, I was trying to figure out your suggestion.  I said
> that ext_x.so uses a few functions in ext_y.so.  I don't see how
> #ifdef-ing sections of ext_x.so is going to help.  Were you
> referring to something like
> 
> #ifdef WIN32
> # define DLLEXPORT __declspec(dllexport)
> #else
> # define DLLEXPORT
> #end




		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail