[#3006] CVS repository — "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>

Hello.

21 messages 2004/06/16
[#3008] Re: CVS repository — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/16

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <hoaz@gala.net> writes:

[#3009] Re: CVS repository — Michal Rokos <michal@...> 2004/06/16

Hi!

[#3057] Ruby 1.8.2 to be released. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

20 messages 2004/06/23

Re: I think I found the recvfrom problem!!

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-06-23 15:24:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #3054
Hi,

In message "Re: I think I found the recvfrom problem!!"
    on 04/06/23, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:

|Perhaps it's a performance thing? As you can always get the peer 
|address of a TCP connection, there's no need to return it every time 
|you receive data.

I don't know, but it's weird to care performance when recvfrom() is
used and address pointer is supplied.  If one really care performance,
he can use recv() instead.  Anyway, no one but BSD socket implementer
knows the real reason.

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next