[#3006] CVS repository — "Eugene Scripnik" <hoaz@...>

Hello.

21 messages 2004/06/16
[#3008] Re: CVS repository — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/16

>>>>> "E" == Eugene Scripnik <hoaz@gala.net> writes:

[#3009] Re: CVS repository — Michal Rokos <michal@...> 2004/06/16

Hi!

[#3057] Ruby 1.8.2 to be released. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

20 messages 2004/06/23

Re: CVS repository

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-06-16 22:44:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #3025
On Jun 16, 2004, at 7:05, Sean E. Russell wrote:

> Subversion requires a lot
> less maintenance than CVS

I'm interested in this statement (as the need to maintain the 
repository is the reason I don't recommend SVN to clients right now. Am 
I wrong in my belief that SVN requires more server-side maintenance 
that CVS?



Dave


In This Thread