[#24648] [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1852: Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present

20 messages 2009/08/01
[#24649] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/01

In article <4a73e51b5a4f9_138119f2a982704e@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#24652] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2009/08/01

> Is it valuable to implement such function?

[#24682] Re: [Bug #1852] Enumerable's #hash Raises ArgumentError When Recursive Values are Present — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/08/02

In article <67e307490908010125r6fa76654pa8e2224f714588fc@mail.gmail.com>,

[#24673] [Feature #1857] install *.h and *.inc — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1857: install *.h and *.inc

21 messages 2009/08/01

[#24732] [Bug #1873] MatchData#[]: Omits All But Last Captures Corresponding to the Same Named Group — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1873: MatchData#[]: Omits All But Last Captures Corresponding to the Same Named Group

12 messages 2009/08/03

[#24775] [Feature #1889] Teach Onigurma Unicode 5.0 Character Properties — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Feature #1889: Teach Onigurma Unicode 5.0 Character Properties

30 messages 2009/08/05

[#24786] [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...>

Bug #1893: Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising

24 messages 2009/08/06
[#28422] [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/02

Issue #1893 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#28438] Re: [Bug #1893] Recursive Enumerable#join is surprising — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/03/03

Hi,

[#24854] embedding ruby 1.9 frustration — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2009/08/10

[#24982] [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

Feature #1961: Kernel#__dir__

26 messages 2009/08/19
[#28898] [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/03/23

Issue #1961 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#28900] Re: [Feature #1961] Kernel#__dir__ — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2010/03/23

On 23.03.10 19:10, Roger Pack wrote:

[#25025] [Backport #1975] Backport Dir.mktmpdir — Kirk Haines <redmine@...>

Backport #1975: Backport Dir.mktmpdir

12 messages 2009/08/21

[#25041] Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

I'd like to propose that we add the following syntax for procs in Ruby:

45 messages 2009/08/23
[#25046] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Caleb Clausen <caleb@...> 2009/08/23

Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#25049] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/08/23

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Caleb Clausen <caleb@inforadical.net>wrote:

[#25058] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/08/23

Hi,

[#25059] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/08/23

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>wrote:

[#25063] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/08/23

Hi --

[#25068] Re: Proposal: Simpler block format — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/08/24

Hi,

[#25086] [Bug #1991] ruby should use twolevel namespace on OS X — Michal Suchanek <redmine@...>

Bug #1991: ruby should use twolevel namespace on OS X

12 messages 2009/08/24

[#25208] Module#prepend and Array#prepend — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

Matz,

23 messages 2009/08/30

[#25210] [Feature #2022] Patch for ruby-1.8.6 and openssl-1.0 — Jeroen van Meeuwen <redmine@...>

Feature #2022: Patch for ruby-1.8.6 and openssl-1.0

15 messages 2009/08/30

[#25220] [Bug #2026] String encodings are not supported by most of IO on Linux — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #2026: String encodings are not supported by most of IO on Linux

18 messages 2009/08/31

[ruby-core:24664] [Bug #1856] [BUG] Segmentation fault in 1.9.1p149

From: Anthony Wright <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-08-01 13:25:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #24664
Bug #1856: [BUG] Segmentation fault in 1.9.1p149
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1856

Author: Anthony Wright
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: core
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]

I have a 120 line pure ruby application that bombs out in 1.9.1p129 after 1-2 seconds with a [BUG] Segmentation fault & [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase.

I'm using a piece of code that I got from Ruby Treasures which has worked fine in 1.8.X for a long time. I'm going through the process of porting to 1.9.1. I've inlined this code, and my little app that uses it is at the bottom.

The error output I see is:

seg-fault.rb:115: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]

-- control frame ----------
c:0008 p:---- s:0040 b:0040 l:000039 d:000039 CFUNC  :readlines
c:0007 p:0011 s:0037 b:0037 l:00157c d:000036 BLOCK  seg-fault.rb:115
c:0006 p:0014 s:0032 b:0032 l:000014 d:000031 BLOCK  seg-fault.rb:95
c:0005 p:0272 s:0026 b:0026 l:000025 d:000025 METHOD seg-fault.rb:78
c:0004 p:0024 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 METHOD seg-fault.rb:94
c:0003 p:0045 s:0006 b:0006 l:00157c d:001f8c EVAL   seg-fault.rb:114
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:00157c d:00157c TOP    <main>:17
---------------------------
seg-fault.rb:115: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i686-linux]

-- control frame ----------
c:0008 p:---- s:0040 b:0040 l:000039 d:000039 CFUNC  :readlines
c:0007 p:0011 s:0037 b:0037 l:00157c d:000036 BLOCK  seg-fault.rb:115
c:0006 p:0014 s:0032 b:0032 l:000014 d:000031 BLOCK  seg-fault.rb:95
c:0005 p:0272 s:0026 b:0026 l:000025 d:000025 METHOD seg-fault.rb:78
c:0004 p:0024 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 METHOD seg-fault.rb:94
c:0003 p:0045 s:0006 b:0006 l:00157c d:001f8c EVAL   seg-fault.rb:114
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:00157c d:00157c TOP    <main>:17
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information-----------------------------------------
seg-fault.rb:115:in `readlines'
seg-fault.rb:115:in `block in <main>'
seg-fault.rb:95:in `block in popen3'
seg-fault.rb:78:in `popen3_with_pid'
seg-fault.rb:94:in `popen3'
seg-fault.rb:114:in `<main>'

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------

[NOTE]
You may encounter a bug of Ruby interpreter. Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

Aborted


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next