From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2009-08-05T05:58:39+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:24764] Re: About An Imaginary Number Literal (Translation)

Roger Pack wrote:
> One thought would be to allow for people to specify "any one character
> ascii suffix" and let them [define or redefine set ones], too.
> i.e.
> 2.0i => 2.0.i
> 2.0x => 2.0.x

Are you suggesting that 2.0x would result in, at parse-time, sending :x 
to 2.0, to generate a literal?

-- 
        vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407