From: Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Date: 2009-08-17T22:29:27+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:24953] Re: [Feature #1857] install *.h and *.inc

I've already written a working Ripper to ruby_parser converter, but
becasue of bug #1939 (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1939#),
it's not reliable enough. Could we please get local variables straight
from Ripper? I can send RipperRubyParser to you if you're interested
(I'm both a Sexp and Ripper-noobie, so you might want to refactor it a
bit).

Oh, and you would also have to update Ruby2Ruby to support the new
syntax (lambda-literal + blocks can capture blocks + probably more
I've forgotten).

This would also be a good time to try to simplify the AST even more.
What'd you think Ryan?

On Aug 17, 7:55�am, Ryan Davis <ryand-r...@zenspider.com> wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2009, at 21:51 , Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
>
> > 2 days ago, I talked with ko1 about Proc#to_source. If �
> > Proc#to_source is
> > supported by Ruby core, you can use ripper for generating S-
> > expressoin.
> > Is this a good solution?
>
> Yes. That would be wonderful.
>
> I can write a ripper AST to ruby_parser converter so that existing �
> tools can remain the same.