[#19731] use of require thread safety — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

I'm sure this has been discussed before, but...should there be

56 messages 2008/11/08
[#19796] Re: use of require thread safety — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/11/11

Hi,

[#21651] Re: use of require thread safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/01/29

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#19798] Re: use of require thread safety — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/11/11

> While a thread is requiring a given file, another thread which

[#20732] Re: use of require thread safety — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/20

> Currently with 1.8.7 (for me) the secondmost thread continues

[#20737] Re: use of require thread safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/20

Roger Pack wrote:

[#20769] Re: use of require thread safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/21

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20795] Re: use of require thread safety — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/12/22

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:05:07AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#19821] Re: use of require thread safety — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/11/11

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:51:45AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#19829] Re: use of require thread safety — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/11

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#19759] Proposal: Method#get_args — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

I'd like to propose a way to introspect into the arguments of a method

97 messages 2008/11/09
[#19787] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/11/11

The only question I have is why would one want to know the names of

[#19789] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/11/11

On Nov 10, 7:18=A0pm, "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2...@gmail.com> wrote:

[#19818] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Mikael Hlund <mikael@...> 2008/11/11

Allow me to throw in my ~.116892074 DKK;

[#19837] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/11

Mikael H淡ilund wrote:

[#19838] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/11/11

[#19870] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/11/12

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 04:48:03AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#19874] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/11/12

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:01:40PM +0900, Brian Candler wrote:

[#19881] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/12

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#19887] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/11/12

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:06:15AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#19889] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/12

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#19892] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/11/12

[#19893] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2008/11/12

> -----Original Message-----

[#19894] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/11/12

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 04:33:07AM +0900, Jim Deville wrote:

[#19895] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/11/12

[#19896] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/12

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#19899] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/11/12

On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#19915] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/11/13

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:02:25AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:

[#19927] Re: {Proc,Method}#parameters (Re: Proposal: Method#get_args) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/11/14

Hi,

[#19784] Status of copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net>

Hi.

22 messages 2008/11/10
[#19799] Re: Status of copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — "Narihiro Nakamura" <authornari@...> 2008/11/11

Hi.

[#19812] Re: Status of copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...> 2008/11/11

Narihiro,

[#19823] Re: Status of copy-on-write friendly garbage collector — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/11/11

Hi,

[#19845] [Bug #743] Socket.gethostbyname returns odd values — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #743: Socket.gethostbyname returns odd values

11 messages 2008/11/11

[#19846] [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #744: memory leak in callcc?

142 messages 2008/11/11
[#21394] [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/01/17

Issue #744 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#21429] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/19

[#21441] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/01/19

Hi,

[#21483] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/21

[#21487] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Michal Babej <calcifer@...> 2009/01/21

On Wednesday 21 of January 2009 10:21:19 Brent Roman wrote:

[#21711] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/02/01

[#22062] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/02/14

>> I've tried that myself but it didn't work very well

[#22265] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Michal Babej <calcifer@...> 2009/02/19

On Saturday 14 of February 2009 08:17:22 Roger Pack wrote:

[#21514] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/22

[#19945] [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/11/15

Issue #744 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#19968] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/11/17

[#19969] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/11/17

At 12:54 08/11/17, Brent Roman wrote:

[#19970] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/11/17

[#19972] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc? — Kurt Stephens <kurt@...> 2008/11/17

A common technique is to allocate a reasonably sized array (256-bytes)

[#20149] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/11/28

[#20517] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/13

> I implemented a scheme for recording the maximum depth of the C stack in

[#20534] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/13

[#20750] [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/21

[#20751] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2008/12/21

[#20752] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/21

[#20781] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/22

First thanks for doing all that hard work. I'm sure it's not pleasant

[#20783] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/22

[#20903] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/26

Seems to overall be a tidge slower for "micro" stuff--5 or 10%.

[#20914] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/27

[#20922] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/27

> You ran this benchmark suite, correct?

[#20931] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/28

[#20995] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/12/30

Hmm interesting.

[#21261] Re: [PATCH] Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2009/01/11

Brent,

[#20168] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/11/30

Hi,

[#20175] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/11/30

The problem can be demonstrated with a very simple program (attached), and

[#20178] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/11/30

[#20185] Re: Promising C coding techniques to reduce MRI's memory use — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/12/01

> What I did come up with was not ugly at all. Factor the unwieldy switch

[#19938] Fibers in 1.8 — "Aman Gupta" <rubytalk@...1.net>

Are there any plans to backport Fiber to ruby 1.8?

13 messages 2008/11/15

[#20008] [Bug #766] 'Not enough space' error on windows — Ittay Dror <redmine@...>

Bug #766: 'Not enough space' error on windows

17 messages 2008/11/20

[#20092] [Bug #797] bug or feature: local method ? — Francois Proulx <redmine@...>

Bug #797: bug or feature: local method ?

23 messages 2008/11/25
[#20097] Re: [Bug #797] bug or feature: local method ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/11/25

Hi,

[#20098] Re: [Bug #797] bug or feature: local method ? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/11/25

[#20100] Re: [Bug #797] bug or feature: local method ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/11/25

Hi,

[#20127] Re: [Bug #797] bug or feature: local method ? — Francoys <francois.pr@...> 2008/11/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[ruby-core:19947] Re: Proposal: Method#get_args

From: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date: 2008-11-15 20:53:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #19947
Hi,

At Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:48:54 +0900,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote in [ruby-core:19942]:
> |I guess so.  I'd like to make sure two more things:
> |
> |  * symbol for block argument should be :block, or anything else?
> |  * if you don't have a rest argument name, you will get [:rest], ok?
> 
> One more: 
> 
> > def foo(a, b = 1, *c, d)
> > => [[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, 1], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d]]
> 
> what if the default value for an optional argument is more than a simple
> literal?   :expr as Austine mentioned in [ruby-core:19882]?  Or drop
> default values altogether?

Since :expr is a valid expression, I don't think it is
reasonable.


Index: iseq.c
===================================================================
--- iseq.c	(revision 20237)
+++ iseq.c	(working copy)
@@ -1275,4 +1275,67 @@ rb_iseq_clone(VALUE iseqval, VALUE newcb
 }
 
+static VALUE
+simple_default_value(const VALUE *seq)
+{
+    VALUE val;
+    switch (*seq++) {
+      case BIN(putnil):
+	val = Qnil;
+      case BIN(putobject):
+	val = *seq++;
+	if (*seq == BIN(setlocal)) break;
+      default:
+	return Qundef;
+    }
+    return val;
+}
+
+VALUE
+rb_iseq_parameters(const rb_iseq_t *iseq)
+{
+    int i, r, s;
+    VALUE a, args = rb_ary_new2(iseq->arg_size);
+    ID req, opt, rest, block;
+#define PARAM_TYPE(type) rb_ary_push(a = rb_ary_new2(2), ID2SYM(type))
+#define PARAM_ID(i) iseq->local_table[i]
+#define PARAM(i, type) (		      \
+	PARAM_TYPE(type),		      \
+	rb_id2name(PARAM_ID(i)) ?	      \
+	rb_ary_push(a, ID2SYM(PARAM_ID(i))) : \
+	a)
+
+    CONST_ID(req, "req");
+    for (i = 0; i < iseq->argc; i++) {
+	rb_ary_push(args, PARAM(i, req));
+    }
+    r = iseq->arg_rest != -1 ? iseq->arg_rest :
+	iseq->arg_post_len > 0 ? iseq->arg_post_start :
+	iseq->arg_block != -1 ? iseq->arg_block :
+	iseq->arg_size;
+    CONST_ID(opt, "opt");
+    for (s = i; i < r; i++) {
+	PARAM_TYPE(opt);
+	if (rb_id2name(PARAM_ID(i))) {
+	    VALUE defval = simple_default_value(iseq->iseq + iseq->arg_opt_table[i-s]);
+	    rb_ary_push(a, ID2SYM(PARAM_ID(i)));
+	    if (defval != Qundef) rb_ary_push(a, defval);
+	}
+	rb_ary_push(args, a);
+    }
+    if (iseq->arg_rest != -1) {
+	CONST_ID(rest, "rest");
+	rb_ary_push(args, PARAM(iseq->arg_rest, rest));
+    }
+    r = iseq->arg_post_start + iseq->arg_post_len;
+    for (i = iseq->arg_post_start; i < r; i++) {
+	rb_ary_push(args, PARAM(i, req));
+    }
+    if (iseq->arg_block != -1) {
+	CONST_ID(block, "block");
+	rb_ary_push(args, PARAM(iseq->arg_block, block));
+    }
+    return args;
+}
+
 /* ruby2cext */
 
Index: proc.c
===================================================================
--- proc.c	(revision 20237)
+++ proc.c	(working copy)
@@ -26,7 +26,10 @@ VALUE rb_cBinding;
 VALUE rb_cProc;
 
+VALUE rb_iseq_parameters(const rb_iseq_t *iseq);
+
 static VALUE bmcall(VALUE, VALUE);
 static int method_arity(VALUE);
 static VALUE rb_obj_is_method(VALUE m);
+static rb_iseq_t *get_method_iseq(VALUE method);
 
 /* Proc */
@@ -616,6 +619,12 @@ get_proc_iseq(VALUE self)
     GetProcPtr(self, proc);
     iseq = proc->block.iseq;
-    if (!RUBY_VM_NORMAL_ISEQ_P(iseq))
-	return 0;
+    if (!RUBY_VM_NORMAL_ISEQ_P(iseq)) {
+	NODE *node = (NODE *)iseq;
+	iseq = 0;
+	if (nd_type(node) == NODE_IFUNC && node->nd_cfnc == bmcall) {
+	    /* method(:foo).to_proc */
+	    iseq = get_method_iseq(node->nd_tval);
+	}
+    }
     return iseq;
 }
@@ -651,4 +660,40 @@ rb_proc_location(VALUE self)
 }
 
+static VALUE
+unnamed_parameters(int arity)
+{
+    VALUE a, param = rb_ary_new2((arity < 0) ? -arity : arity);
+    int n = (arity < 0) ? ~arity : arity;
+    ID req, rest;
+    CONST_ID(req, "req");
+    a = rb_ary_new3(1, ID2SYM(req));
+    OBJ_FREEZE(a);
+    for (; n; --n) {
+	rb_ary_push(param, a);
+    }
+    if (arity < 0) {
+	CONST_ID(rest, "rest");
+	rb_ary_store(param, ~arity, rb_ary_new3(1, ID2SYM(rest)));
+    }
+    return param;
+}
+
+/*
+ * call-seq:
+ *    proc.parameters  => array
+ *
+ * returns the parameter information of this proc
+ */
+
+static VALUE
+rb_proc_parameters(VALUE self)
+{
+    rb_iseq_t *iseq = get_proc_iseq(self);
+    if (!iseq) {
+	return unnamed_parameters(proc_arity(self));
+    }
+    return rb_iseq_parameters(iseq);
+}
+
 /*
  * call-seq:
@@ -1461,4 +1506,6 @@ get_method_iseq(VALUE method)
     body = data->body;
     switch (nd_type(body)) {
+      case NODE_BMETHOD:
+	return get_proc_iseq(body->nd_cval);
       case RUBY_VM_METHOD_NODE:
 	GetISeqPtr((VALUE)body->nd_body, iseq);
@@ -1485,4 +1532,21 @@ rb_method_location(VALUE method)
 
 /*
+ * call-seq:
+ *    meth.parameters  => array
+ *
+ * returns the parameter information of this method
+ */
+
+static VALUE
+rb_method_parameters(VALUE method)
+{
+    rb_iseq_t *iseq = get_method_iseq(method);
+    if (!iseq) {
+	return unnamed_parameters(method_arity(method));
+    }
+    return rb_iseq_parameters(iseq);
+}
+
+/*
  *  call-seq:
  *   meth.to_s      =>  string
@@ -1812,4 +1876,5 @@ Init_Proc(void)
     rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "curry", proc_curry, -1);
     rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "source_location", rb_proc_location, 0);
+    rb_define_method(rb_cProc, "parameters", rb_proc_parameters, 0);
 
     /* Exceptions */
@@ -1847,4 +1912,5 @@ Init_Proc(void)
     rb_define_method(rb_cMethod, "unbind", method_unbind, 0);
     rb_define_method(rb_cMethod, "source_location", rb_method_location, 0);
+    rb_define_method(rb_cMethod, "parameters", rb_method_parameters, 0);
     rb_define_method(rb_mKernel, "method", rb_obj_method, 1);
     rb_define_method(rb_mKernel, "public_method", rb_obj_public_method, 1);
@@ -1865,4 +1931,5 @@ Init_Proc(void)
     rb_define_method(rb_cUnboundMethod, "bind", umethod_bind, 1);
     rb_define_method(rb_cUnboundMethod, "source_location", rb_method_location, 0);
+    rb_define_method(rb_cUnboundMethod, "parameters", rb_method_parameters, 0);
 
     /* Module#*_method */
Index: test/ruby/test_proc.rb
===================================================================
--- test/ruby/test_proc.rb	(revision 20237)
+++ test/ruby/test_proc.rb	(working copy)
@@ -674,3 +674,46 @@ class TestProc < Test::Unit::TestCase
     assert_equal([1,2,[3],4,5], r, "[ruby-core:19485]")
   end
+
+  def test_parameters
+    assert_equal([], proc {}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([], proc {||}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], proc {|a|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], proc {|a, b|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, :a], [:block, :b]], proc {|a=:a, &b|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, :b]], proc {|a, b=:b|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], proc {|*a|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], proc {|a, *b, &c|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], proc {|a, *b, c|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], proc {|a, *b, c, &d|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, :b], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], proc {|a, b=:b, *c, d, &e|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], proc {|(a), &b|}.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b], [:opt, :c, :c], [:opt, :d, :d], [:rest, :e], [:req, :f], [:req, :g], [:block, :h]], proc {|a,b,c=:c,d=:d,*e,f,g,&h|}.parameters) 
+  end
+
+  def pm0() end
+  def pm1(a) end
+  def pm2(a, b) end
+  def pmo1(a = :a, &b) end
+  def pmo2(a, b = :b) end
+  def pmo3(*a) end
+  def pmo4(a, *b, &c) end
+  def pmo5(a, *b, c) end
+  def pmo6(a, *b, c, &d) end
+  def pmo7(a, b = :b, *c, d, &e) end
+  def pma1((a), &b) end
+
+
+  def test_bound_parameters
+    assert_equal([], method(:pm0).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], method(:pm1).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], method(:pm2).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, :a], [:block, :b]], method(:pmo1).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, :b]], method(:pmo2).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], method(:pmo3).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], method(:pmo4).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], method(:pmo5).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], method(:pmo6).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, :b], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], method(:pmo7).to_proc.parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], method(:pma1).to_proc.parameters)
+  end
 end
Index: test/ruby/test_method.rb
===================================================================
--- test/ruby/test_method.rb	(revision 20237)
+++ test/ruby/test_method.rb	(working copy)
@@ -21,4 +21,6 @@ class TestMethod < Test::Unit::TestCase
   def mo5(a, *b, c) end
   def mo6(a, *b, c, &d) end
+  def mo7(a, b = nil, *c, d, &e) end
+  def ma1((a), &b) end
 
   class Base
@@ -222,3 +224,71 @@ class TestMethod < Test::Unit::TestCase
     assert_raise(ArgumentError) { o.method(:foo).call(1) }
   end
+
+  define_method(:pm0) {||}
+  define_method(:pm1) {|a|}
+  define_method(:pm2) {|a, b|}
+  define_method(:pmo1) {|a = nil, &b|}
+  define_method(:pmo2) {|a, b = nil|}
+  define_method(:pmo3) {|*a|}
+  define_method(:pmo4) {|a, *b, &c|}
+  define_method(:pmo5) {|a, *b, c|}
+  define_method(:pmo6) {|a, *b, c, &d|}
+  define_method(:pmo7) {|a, b = nil, *c, d, &e|}
+  define_method(:pma1) {|(a), &b|}
+
+  def test_bound_parameters
+    assert_equal([], method(:m0).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], method(:m1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], method(:m2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, nil], [:block, :b]], method(:mo1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil]], method(:mo2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], method(:mo3).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], method(:mo4).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], method(:mo5).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], method(:mo6).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], method(:mo7).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], method(:ma1).parameters)
+  end
+
+  def test_unbound_parameters
+    assert_equal([], self.class.instance_method(:m0).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], self.class.instance_method(:m1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:m2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, nil], [:block, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:mo1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil]], self.class.instance_method(:mo2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], self.class.instance_method(:mo3).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], self.class.instance_method(:mo4).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], self.class.instance_method(:mo5).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], self.class.instance_method(:mo6).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], self.class.instance_method(:mo7).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:ma1).parameters)
+  end
+
+  def test_bmethod_bound_parameters
+    assert_equal([], method(:pm0).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], method(:pm1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], method(:pm2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, nil], [:block, :b]], method(:pmo1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil]], method(:pmo2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], method(:pmo3).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], method(:pmo4).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], method(:pmo5).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], method(:pmo6).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], method(:pmo7).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], method(:pma1).parameters)
+  end
+
+  def test_bmethod_unbound_parameters
+    assert_equal([], self.class.instance_method(:pm0).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a]], self.class.instance_method(:pm1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:req, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:pm2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:opt, :a, nil], [:block, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo1).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo2).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:rest, :a]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo3).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:block, :c]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo4).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo5).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:rest, :b], [:req, :c], [:block, :d]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo6).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req, :a], [:opt, :b, nil], [:rest, :c], [:req, :d], [:block, :e]], self.class.instance_method(:pmo7).parameters)
+    assert_equal([[:req], [:block, :b]], self.class.instance_method(:pma1).parameters)
+  end
 end


-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread