From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2008-11-26T04:46:25+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:20103] Re: Is missing documentation considered a bug?

------=_Part_8166_5123838.1227642664233
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 03:33, Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net> wrote:

> That leads to the general question: Should missing, incomplete or erroneous
> documentation be considered and filed as a bug more aggressively?


In my opinion yes, but a quick look at the state of the standard library
will show you that my opinion doesn't count for much :-)

http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/


mathew

------=_Part_8166_5123838.1227642664233
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 03:33, Florian Gilcher <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:flo@andersground.net">flo@andersground.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
That leads to the general question: Should missing, incomplete or erroneous documentation be considered and filed as a bug more aggressively?</blockquote><div><br>In my opinion yes, but a quick look at the state of the standard library will show you that my opinion doesn&#39;t count for much :-)<br>
<br><a href="http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/">http://www.ruby-doc.org/stdlib/</a><br>&nbsp;<br><br>mathew<br></div></div>

------=_Part_8166_5123838.1227642664233--