[#19064] Fwd: [ruby-dev:36523] Re: Encoding.default_internal — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
There has been some disconnect lately between ruby-dev and ruby-core
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#19075] Request For Removal: No Operator Concatenation — James Gray <james@...>
I'm disappointed that Ruby still supports this goofy syntax:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:58 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:29 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:42 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:25 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 1, 2008, at 10:33 PM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#19127] Autoload and class definition — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>
I've found an interesting corner case of autoload behavior, which I think i=
[#19132] [Feature #615] "with" operator — Lavir the Whiolet <redmine@...>
Feature #615: "with" operator
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:46:49AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:56:23PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:47:23AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19168] [Bug:1.9] rubygems depend on test/unit/ui/console/testrunner — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2008, at 07:43 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
[#19225] Module.freeze vs Object.freeze — Curt Hagenlocher <curth@...>
What's the difference between Module.freeze and Object.freeze? They seem t=
[#19242] Regexp Order Matters in 1.9 — James Gray <james@...>
I'm just curious, why does this work:
[#19250] default_internal encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm documenting default_internal for the PickAxe, and have a couple of
Hi,
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:09:31 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan / atdesk.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:30:31AM +0900, Michael Selig wrote:
Paul Brannan wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#19294] [Bug #634] Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #634: Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9
Issue #634 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#19298] [Feature #639] New String#encode_internal method — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #639: New String#encode_internal method
Hi,
[#19304] 1.9, encoding & win32 wide char support — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>
hello,
[#19315] [Feature #643] __DIR__ — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #643: __DIR__
[#19332] Can I confirm a change to source file encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
A month ago, if I had
[#19342] [Bug #649] Memory leak in a array assignment? — Henri Suur-Inkeroinen <redmine@...>
Bug #649: Memory leak in a array assignment?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
[#19343] Yet another block semantic/syntax question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19350] Net::HTTP.post_form bug : can't post form to correct uri which contains QueryString(QueryString part are lost) and revise — Klesh <kleshwong@...>
Hi,
You are trying to use GET-style query params instead of POSTing the
Dear Matt
From my experience, it's simply easier to process requests that way,
Thanks,
2008/10/17 Matt Todd <chiology@gmail.com>:
On Oct 19, 2008, at 8:55 AM, mathew wrote:
[#19373] capture_io in minitest — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
capture_io changes $stdout.fileno.
[#19378] Constant names in 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
When Ruby makes the tIDENTIFIER/tCONSTANT test, it looks to see if the =20=
Hi,
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#19385] [Bug #657] Thread.new { fork } — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #657: Thread.new { fork }
[#19388] [Bug #663] Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..." — Artem Vorozhtsov <redmine@...>
Bug #663: Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..."
[#19397] [Feature #666] Enumerable::to_hash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #666: Enumerable::to_hash
Issue #666 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Hi,
Thank you for this explanation. If I understand correctly, you want methods
Hi,
Thank you for your response
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:06 +0900
[#19410] rb_errinfo() vs rb_rubylevel_errinfo() — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
What is the difference between these two functions?
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:34:19AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#19413] Is this expected, or should I report it? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Given
[#19422] Now that lambda has more powerful arguments... — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
is there anything that
Dave Thomas schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:01:45AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi --
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:38:19AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Oct 21, 2008, at 4:24 PM, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19446] confused by this catch table — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
irb(main):001:0> require 'internal/proc'
[#19458] Should Method@instance_methods reveal protected methods? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
The RDoc says it just returns public methods, but
[#19465] [Bug #680] csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...>
Bug #680: csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch
Hi,
A default for the source encoding has been discussed quite a long
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:26:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:34:26 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:07:54 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:27:57 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:55:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 24, 2008, at 1:52 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 8:06 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:07:13 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Oct 26, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
[#19468] [Bug:1.9] failures of test/minitest — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#19478] Ruby 1.8.7 Throwing "Too many open files" Exception lately??? — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Group,
[#19487] [ANN] Sipper 1.1.3 Released — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>
1.1.3 of SIPr pronounced as Sipper has been released earlier this month.
[#19504] Is the stabby proc gone? broken? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19523] Too Many Files Error -- Test Case Produced. — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
[#19555] Managing 1.9 threads in extensions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm trying to pin down the rules for folks who write extensions for
[#19561] Was there a feature freeze on October 25th? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Curious authors want to know... :)
[#19564] Ruby 1.9.1 preview1 is out — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi all,
[#19566] GC thought — "Roger Pack" <roger.pack@...>
Here is a recent patch I've been experimenting with--for any advice. [1]
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:02:17 +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> Letting the program continue execution during the mark phase could cause
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:04:52AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
2008/10/28 Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com>:
Robert Klemme wrote:
Robert Klemme wrote:
[#19578] [Bug #691] Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822 — Chun Wang <redmine@...>
Bug #691: Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822
[#19583] [Bug #694] eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Bug #694: eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit
[#19590] [Feature #695] More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #695: More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings
Hi,
At 07:14 08/10/31, Michael Selig wrote:
Hi
[#19599] Future of Continuations — "r. schempp" <ruben.schempp@...>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 06:54:06PM +0900, r. schempp wrote:
r. schempp schrieb:
[#19604] test failure in r20022 — Mike Stok <mike@...>
I noticed this failure in my morning build of ruby trunk on my laptop:
[#19610] [Bug 1.9] gem_prelude.rb always require rubygems — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#19618] Result of backticks — Jim Deville <jdeville@...>
`echo disc world` returns "disc world\n"
[#19634] performance issues with --enable-pthread on Solaris. — Paul van den Bogaard <Paul.Vandenbogaard@...>
Introduction
[#19660] Odd TypeError in inject (1.9.1 preview 1) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:20 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>wrote:
[#19668] [Bug #703] string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #703: string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads
Hi,
[ruby-core:19395] Re: Net::HTTP.post_form bug : can't post form to correct uri which contains QueryString(QueryString part are lost) and revise
On Oct 19, 2008, at 8:55 AM, mathew wrote:
> The specification for URIs is RFC3986, and the specification for HTTP
> is RFC 2616.
>
> The previous version of the URI specification, RFC 2396, is clearer
> about this issue. It says:
Quoting from the top of RFC3986: "Obsoletes: 2732, 2396, 1808 "
And subsequently:
3.4. Query
The query component contains non-hierarchical data that, along with
data in the path component (Section 3.3), serves to identify a
resource within the scope of the URI's scheme and naming authority
(if any). The query component is indicated by the first question
mark ("?") character and terminated by a number sign ("#") character
or by the end of the URI.
Thus, there is no support in the in-effect Internet Standard for the
following assertions:
> This means that the query part of the URI is never part of the address
> of a resource; it is always a string of information which is to be
> passed to a resource.
...
> So POST methods can only be applied to a resource. And a resource
> cannot require a query to address it.
Further on...
> If you know of a product that requires a query parameter as
> part of the address of a resource, you should file a bug report
> against that product.
Good luck. You'll need it.
> Informally, it makes no sense to allow query parameters as well as
> encoded body data in an HTTP POST. You are basically sending two
> conflicting sets of parameters.
I agree this practice has historically been unusual. However, I see
no architectural reason why someone (for example, in an AtomPub
dialogue) might not want to do this; the query selects some collection
and the body of the POST goes to that collection.
For what it's worth, RFC3986 was one of the most heavily-discussed and
closely-examined specs in history. Nothing is there by accident. It
should not be transgressed without a lot of soul-searching.
-Tim