From: Nobuyoshi Nakada Date: 2008-10-06T10:46:49+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:19137] Re: [Feature #615] "with" operator Hi, At Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:24:46 +0900, Lavir the Whiolet wrote in [ruby-core:19132]: > "with" operator is required. It must work like an ordinary > method which gets one arguemnt and a block. All expressions > in the block are not required to point the argument > explicitly; all method calls are related to the argument by > default. No. I'd implemented and tested it once but found it's just problematic rather than useful. For instance, how do you consider about instance variables? -- Nobu Nakada