[#19064] Fwd: [ruby-dev:36523] Re: Encoding.default_internal — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
There has been some disconnect lately between ruby-dev and ruby-core
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#19075] Request For Removal: No Operator Concatenation — James Gray <james@...>
I'm disappointed that Ruby still supports this goofy syntax:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:58 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:29 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 11:42 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:25 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Jim Freeze wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 1, 2008, at 10:33 PM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#19127] Autoload and class definition — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...>
I've found an interesting corner case of autoload behavior, which I think is wrong.
[#19132] [Feature #615] "with" operator — Lavir the Whiolet <redmine@...>
Feature #615: "with" operator
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:46:49AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:56:23PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:47:23AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19168] [Bug:1.9] rubygems depend on test/unit/ui/console/testrunner — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2008, at 07:43 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
[#19225] Module.freeze vs Object.freeze — Curt Hagenlocher <curth@...>
What's the difference between Module.freeze and Object.freeze? They seem to have the same effect.
[#19242] Regexp Order Matters in 1.9 — James Gray <james@...>
I'm just curious, why does this work:
[#19250] default_internal encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm documenting default_internal for the PickAxe, and have a couple of
Hi,
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:09:31 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan / atdesk.com> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:30:31AM +0900, Michael Selig wrote:
Paul Brannan wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#19294] [Bug #634] Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #634: Time parsing works in 1.8 but not 1.9
Issue #634 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#19298] [Feature #639] New String#encode_internal method — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #639: New String#encode_internal method
Hi,
[#19304] 1.9, encoding & win32 wide char support — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>
hello,
[#19315] [Feature #643] __DIR__ — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #643: __DIR__
[#19332] Can I confirm a change to source file encoding — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
A month ago, if I had
[#19342] [Bug #649] Memory leak in a array assignment? — Henri Suur-Inkeroinen <redmine@...>
Bug #649: Memory leak in a array assignment?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
[#19343] Yet another block semantic/syntax question — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19350] Net::HTTP.post_form bug : can't post form to correct uri which contains QueryString(QueryString part are lost) and revise — Klesh <kleshwong@...>
Hi,
You are trying to use GET-style query params instead of POSTing the
Dear Matt
From my experience, it's simply easier to process requests that way,
Thanks,
2008/10/17 Matt Todd <chiology@gmail.com>:
On Oct 19, 2008, at 8:55 AM, mathew wrote:
[#19373] capture_io in minitest — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
capture_io changes $stdout.fileno.
[#19378] Constant names in 1.9 — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
When Ruby makes the tIDENTIFIER/tCONSTANT test, it looks to see if the
Hi,
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:32 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#19385] [Bug #657] Thread.new { fork } — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #657: Thread.new { fork }
[#19388] [Bug #663] Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..." — Artem Vorozhtsov <redmine@...>
Bug #663: Benchmark.measure outputs different result when executed using command line "ruby -e ..."
[#19397] [Feature #666] Enumerable::to_hash — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #666: Enumerable::to_hash
Issue #666 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Hi,
Thank you for this explanation. If I understand correctly, you want methods
Hi,
Thank you for your response
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:06 +0900
[#19410] rb_errinfo() vs rb_rubylevel_errinfo() — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
What is the difference between these two functions?
Hi,
[#19413] Is this expected, or should I report it? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Given
[#19422] Now that lambda has more powerful arguments... — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
is there anything that
Dave Thomas schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:01:45AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi --
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:38:19AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Oct 21, 2008, at 4:24 PM, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
[#19446] confused by this catch table — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
irb(main):001:0> require 'internal/proc'
[#19458] Should Method@instance_methods reveal protected methods? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
The RDoc says it just returns public methods, but
[#19465] [Bug #680] csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...>
Bug #680: csv.rb: CSV.parse is too late when encoding is mismatch
Hi,
A default for the source encoding has been discussed quite a long
On Oct 24, 2008, at 1:52 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 8:06 AM, James Gray wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:07:13 +1100, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>
On Oct 26, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Michael Selig wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:26:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:34:26 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:07:54 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:27:57 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:55:32 +1100, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
On Oct 27, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#19468] [Bug:1.9] failures of test/minitest — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#19478] Ruby 1.8.7 Throwing "Too many open files" Exception lately??? — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Group,
[#19487] [ANN] Sipper 1.1.3 Released — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>
1.1.3 of SIPr pronounced as Sipper has been released earlier this month.
[#19504] Is the stabby proc gone? broken? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#19523] Too Many Files Error -- Test Case Produced. — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
[#19555] Managing 1.9 threads in extensions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I'm trying to pin down the rules for folks who write extensions for
[#19561] Was there a feature freeze on October 25th? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Curious authors want to know... :)
[#19564] Ruby 1.9.1 preview1 is out — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi all,
[#19566] GC thought — "Roger Pack" <roger.pack@...>
Here is a recent patch I've been experimenting with--for any advice. [1]
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:02:17 +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
> Letting the program continue execution during the mark phase could cause
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:04:52AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
2008/10/28 Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com>:
Robert Klemme wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#19578] [Bug #691] Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822 — Chun Wang <redmine@...>
Bug #691: Time::zone_utc? does not follow rfc2822
[#19583] [Bug #694] eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Bug #694: eof? call on a pty IO object causes application to exit
[#19590] [Feature #695] More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings — Michael Selig <redmine@...>
Feature #695: More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings
Hi,
At 07:14 08/10/31, Michael Selig wrote:
Hi
[#19599] Future of Continuations — "r. schempp" <ruben.schempp@...>
Hi,
r. schempp schrieb:
r. schempp schrieb:
[#19604] test failure in r20022 — Mike Stok <mike@...>
I noticed this failure in my morning build of ruby trunk on my laptop:
[#19610] [Bug 1.9] gem_prelude.rb always require rubygems — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#19618] Result of backticks — Jim Deville <jdeville@...>
`echo disc world` returns "disc world\n"
[#19634] performance issues with --enable-pthread on Solaris. — Paul van den Bogaard <Paul.Vandenbogaard@...>
Introduction
[#19660] Odd TypeError in inject (1.9.1 preview 1) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:20 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>wrote:
[#19668] [Bug #703] string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #703: string output duplication occurs if the same file descriptor written to in different threads
Hi,
[ruby-core:19590] [Feature #695] More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings
Feature #695: More flexibility when combining ASCII-8BIT strings with other encodings
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/695
Author: Michael Selig
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: M17N
Consider the following 3 Ruby statements:
# String#pack always returns ASCII-8BIT
s1 = [97, 98, 99, 1589].pack("U*")
# \xNN returns the source encoding (even if it is an invalid string), or ASCII-8BIT if not set
s2 = "abc\xD8\xB5"
# \uNNNN always returns UTF-8
s3 = "abc\u0635"
All of s1, s2, and s3 have the same contents, but different encodings. When you try to combine them, you get different "encoding compatibility" problems, which can change depending on the source encoding, due to the treatment of s2.
I would like to see Ruby be able to combine all the above without error. I don't think it is reasonable to have to use "force_encoding" in these cases. This would
- give better compatibility with 1.8,
- make handling of methods returning ASCII-8BIT strings much easier (eg String#pack and libraries which return strings in ASCII-8BIT because the encoding is unknown)
- reduce the confusion caused with "\x" producing a string which depends on the source encoding (which I dislike - I think it should always return ASCII-8BIT).
So the feature request is:
When combining 2 strings, with one being ASCII-8BIT, and the other is encoding "E":
1) If the ASCII-8BIT string is valid if forced to encoding E, then treat the ASCII-8BIT string as being in encoding E;
2) Otherwise treat both strings as ASCII-8BIT.
Part (2) is less important, and can probably be omitted if it is hard to implement.
Thank you
Michael Selig
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org