[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[ruby-talk:00485] Re: Modified debug.rb

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 1999-07-14 05:57:18 UTC
List: ruby-talk #485
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:00481] Modified debug.rb"
    on 99/07/13, Michael Hohn <hohn@math.utah.edu> writes:

|over the weekend, I have made a modified version of the debug.rb file
|to also handle the "raise" event (from eval.c").

I'd like to see your code.  Could you post it to the list please?

In message "[ruby-talk:00482] Re: Modified debug.rb"
    on 99/07/13, Michael Hohn <hohn@math.utah.edu> writes:

|Is there a way to skip (in this example) the exception from "bar('a')"
|and still execute "bar(122)"?

I'm not sure yet.  Let me check your code and think about it.

|P.S.  Matz, perhaps you want to merge my modifications to debug.rb
|with nahi's?  This may not be pretty, though..

Sure.
						matz.
p.s.
University of Utah.., I'd like to visit SLC again someday.
Last time I couldn't speak English at all.
My ability has been improved a bit since then.

In This Thread