ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01

[#408] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

> - Range::new(1, 9, -2) -- ERROR!

[#411] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi,

[#415] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Julian R Fondren wrote:

[#409] open without variables and implicit closing — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

If I use File.open without saving its return to a file, how can I or do I

[#410] Re: open without variables and implicit closing — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi,

[#414] Re: open without variables and implicit closing — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

> (c)

[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#417] regular expression lookbehinds — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/01

I'd like to suggest that the zero-width lookbehind and negative

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#427] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/02

On Fri, 02 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#428] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/03

Hi,

[#429] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/03

On Sat, 03 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#430] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/05

Hi,

[#431] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/07

On Mon, 05 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#432] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#433] pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#435] Re: pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/08

Hi,

[#437] Re: pearl, perl, ruby, and ruby — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/08

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#434] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/08

On Thu, 08 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#436] redefinition and alias (Re: New feature for Ruby?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/08

In message "[ruby-talk:00434] Re: New feature for Ruby?"

[#438] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi

[#439] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#451] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/11

Hi

[#458] Re: New feature for Ruby? — kikutani@... 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 12:23:49 +0900 (JST),

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09

[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#452] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/11

Hi,

[#456] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#460] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#465] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/12

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#466] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

In message "[ruby-talk:00465] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#459] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Akira Endo <akendo@...3.rim.or.jp> 1999/07/12

Hi, gotoken,

[#461] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#462] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

Hello, there.

[#464] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/12

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#467] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

Hi,

[#468] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/12

In message "[ruby-talk:00467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#474] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00471] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#480] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/13

On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#493] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/14

In message "[ruby-talk:00480] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#495] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#475] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00473] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#476] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/13

[#477] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/13

In message "[ruby-talk:00476] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09

[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[#445] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/09

[#446] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — kikutani@... 1999/07/09

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 03:20:23 +0900 (JST),

[#447] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

In message "[ruby-talk:00446] Re: interactive ruby, debugger"

[#448] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/10

Hi,

[#450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/10

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#453] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi, ....Guten Morgen!

[#455] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi all,

[#457] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/11

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#479] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/13

Hi,

[#483] coderefs — Julian R Fondren <julian@...> 1999/07/14

Does Ruby have the concept of an "anonymous" method, similar to Perl's

[#484] Re: coderefs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#486] Re: coderefs — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/14

[#489] Re: coderefs — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#487] Re: coderefs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#449] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/10

Hi NaHi :-)

[#454] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/11

Hi gotoken,

[#463] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/12

[#478] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/13

Hi,

[#513] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/23

Hello, is there any person who uses debug.rb?

[#517] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#514] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#515] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#518] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 1999/07/23

Hi,

[#516] Re: interactive ruby, debugger — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/23

[#481] Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello again,

4 messages 1999/07/13

[#482] Re: Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/13

[#485] Re: Modified debug.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#488] Re: Modified debug.rb — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/14

[#490] Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi matz,

6 messages 1999/07/14

[#491] Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#494] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/14

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#499] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#500] Re: Ruby's GC (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#492] Syntax tree (Re: Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/14

Hi,

[#496] serialization of objects? — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

3 messages 1999/07/14

[#497] Re: serialization of objects? — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 1999/07/15

Hi,

[#498] Re: serialization of objects? — Michael Hohn <hohn@...> 1999/07/15

[#501] Ruby 1.3.5 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.5 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/07/15

[#502] One question about classes written in C. — Clemens.Hintze@...

3 messages 1999/07/16

[#504] Re: One question about classes written in C. — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/18

In message "[ruby-talk:00502] One question about classes written in C."

[#505] Re: One question about classes written in C. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/19

Hi,

[#503] FromJapan: #3 — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

Hi folks!

1 message 1999/07/17

[#506] Re: One question about classes written in C. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

I think Cle made mistake; forwarded.

4 messages 1999/07/19

[#507] Re: One question about classes written in C. — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/20

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#508] Re: One question about classes written in C. — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/20

Hi Cle,

[#511] Re: One question about classes written in C. — c.hintze@... 1999/07/20

On 20 Jul, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#509] Extension Tutorial? — Clemens.Hintze@...

3 messages 1999/07/20

[#510] Re: Extension Tutorial? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/20

Hi,

[#512] Re: Extension Tutorial? — c.hintze@... 1999/07/20

On 20 Jul, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#519] CGI.rb — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>

Hi...

7 messages 1999/07/24

[#520] Re: CGI.rb — OZAWA Sakuro <crouton@...> 1999/07/24

> I am using CGI.rb. It's very nice.

[#524] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

CGI.rb included rd(Ruby Document).

[#525] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 08:16:33AM +0900,

[#521] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

Hello.

[#522] Re: CGI.rb — OZAWA Sakuro <crouton@...> 1999/07/24

> > I am using CGI.rb. It's very nice.

[#523] Re: CGI.rb — Wakou Aoyama <wakou@...> 1999/07/24

On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 06:47:56AM +0900,

[#526] Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

6 messages 1999/07/25

[#529] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#532] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#533] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/26

Hi,

[#534] Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/26

On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#535] Objects in Ruby (Re: Re: Another way for this? And a new proposal!) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/26

Hi,

[#527] What is the difference? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

2 messages 1999/07/25

[#531] Re: What is the difference? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

[#528] Single char conventions in Ruby's core? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

2 messages 1999/07/25

[#530] Re: Single char conventions in Ruby's core? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/25

Hi,

[#536] Ruby 1.3.6 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.6 is out, check out:

1 message 1999/07/28

[#537] Ruby 1.3.6 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Ruby 1.3.6 is repacked, check out:

1 message 1999/07/28

[#538] OED 1999 Appeal — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)

Hi,

1 message 1999/07/29

[ruby-talk:00487] Re: coderefs

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Date: 1999-07-14 06:07:59 UTC

List: ruby-talk #487

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:00486] Re: coderefs"
    on 99/07/13, Michael Hohn <hohn@math.utah.edu> writes:

|as opposed to using the parentheses; something like
|
|   f = obj.method(:method_name)
|   f(args)
|
|would be far cleaner.  Does the syntax f() have a fixed, predefined meaning?  

I agree f(args) is far cleaner than f.call(args), but Ruby tries to
call the method named `f' instead of invoking method object referred
by the local variable `f'.  It's because the namespaces for methods
and variables are separated, like plain lisp, not like scheme.

If there's any workaround, I'd like to know.

                                                matz.

Thread

In This Thread