[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...
Hi all,
27 messages
1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/01
Hi Clemens,
[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/01
On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/01
Hi
[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/02
Hi,
[#427] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/02
On Fri, 02 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#428] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/03
Hi,
[#429] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/03
On Sat, 03 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#430] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/05
Hi,
[#431] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/07
On Mon, 05 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
21 messages
1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/09
Hi,
[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/09
On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#452] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/11
Hi,
[#462] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/12
Hello, there.
[#464] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/12
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/12
Hi,
[#468] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/12
In message "[ruby-talk:00467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"
[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>
Hello,
26 messages
1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/09
Hi Michael,
[#448] Re: interactive ruby, debugger
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
1999/07/10
Hi,
[#450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/10
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#490] Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi matz,
6 messages
1999/07/14
[#501] Ruby 1.3.5 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.5 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/07/15
[#519] CGI.rb — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi...
7 messages
1999/07/24
[#526] Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
6 messages
1999/07/25
[ruby-talk:00450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger
From:
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date:
1999-07-10 20:23:22 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #450
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote: >Hi, Hi too, > >I am 'NaHi'. >I sent mail to ruby-list several times, but am newbie here. I am very glad to see you here. It is valueable every time, if we can draw attention of these who have used Ruby for a certain time. As I hope that Ruby can become more international in future, I enjoy everybody comes from ruby-list to ruby-talk :-)))) >I'm sorry for my poor English.(in advance :-) Ey... as long as you can make clear your opinions, there is no poor English, IMHO. :-) Furthermore the more you use it, the better you become, neh? [...] > >As gotoken-san saying, the debugger is not part of the interpreter, >but has a few interfaces which supports debugging or tracing >like set_trace_func(), caller(). You can see these used in debug.rb and trace.rb. And me, for example, like that! The most exellent languages have no debugger build-in (Ruby, Python, Perl ;-) Only interfaces are forseen. So if somebody doesn't like a certain debuuger, simply write a new one, without dragging the old one as uneccessary ballast! > >And then, using debug.rb and trace.rb, > ruby's debugging environment is powerful enough, I think. Powerful, yes! But it lacks comfort. Except the ruby-debug.el, of course. But due to we only have debugging hooks perhaps the future will show us a debugger with a GUI like in Python or Perl. [...] ># Although NaHi imitated Cle, NaHi don't know the meaning of '\' in >a head. :-) Do you know TeX? TeX is a typesetting system; a language you use to structure text during write. No WYSIWYG! After compilation the text can be print out. Very beautiful. I have scanned my hand-written signature, used MetaFont (part of TeX) to generate a TeX font out from the scanned-in GIF file, and then use the self-defined command `\cle' to insert my signature on that place in my text ;-))) In TeX, nearly all commands begin with '\'. >\NaHi \cle [...]