[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[ruby-talk:00450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date: 1999-07-10 20:23:22 UTC
List: ruby-talk #450
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote:
>Hi,

Hi too,

>
>I am 'NaHi'.
>I sent mail to ruby-list several times, but am newbie here.

I am very glad to see you here. It is valueable every time, if we
can draw attention of these who have used Ruby for a certain time.

As I hope that Ruby can become more international in future, I enjoy
everybody comes from ruby-list to ruby-talk :-))))

>I'm sorry for my poor English.(in advance :-)

Ey... as long as you can make clear your opinions, there is no poor
English, IMHO. :-) Furthermore the more you use it, the better you
become, neh?

[...]

>
>As gotoken-san saying, the debugger is not part of the interpreter,
>but has a few interfaces which supports debugging or tracing
>like set_trace_func(),  caller(). You can see these used in debug.rb and trace.rb.

And me, for example, like that! The most exellent languages have no
debugger build-in (Ruby, Python, Perl ;-) Only interfaces are
forseen. So if somebody doesn't like a certain debuuger, simply write
a new one, without dragging the old one as uneccessary ballast!

>
>And then, using debug.rb and trace.rb,
> ruby's debugging environment is powerful enough, I think.

Powerful, yes! But it lacks comfort. Except the ruby-debug.el, of
course. But due to we only have debugging hooks perhaps the future
will show us a debugger with a GUI like in Python or Perl.

[...]

># Although NaHi imitated Cle, NaHi don't know the meaning of '\' in
>a head. :-)

Do you know TeX? TeX is a typesetting system; a language you use to
structure text during write. No WYSIWYG! After compilation the text
can be print out. Very beautiful.

I have scanned my hand-written signature, used MetaFont (part of TeX)
to generate a TeX font out from the scanned-in GIF file, and then use
the self-defined command `\cle' to insert my signature on that place
in my text ;-))) In TeX, nearly all commands begin with '\'.

>\NaHi

\cle

[...]

In This Thread