[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...

Hi all,

27 messages 1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/01

Hi Clemens,

[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/01

On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/01

Hi

[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/02

Hi,

[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

21 messages 1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/07/09

Hi,

[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/07/09

On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:

[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>

Hello,

26 messages 1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/07/09

Hi Michael,

[ruby-talk:00453] Re: interactive ruby, debugger

From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 1999-07-11 05:38:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #453
Hi, ....Guten Morgen!

...As gotoken-san saying, in Japan, many students in department of
technology learn German as the second foreign language.
I, as well as them, took German, but I can remember little
German grammar, pronounciation, and spelling...
So, all I can say when I meet the German on the street,
"Guten Morgen! May I help you?" ...ahh..that's not German...

> From: Clemens Hintze [mailto:c.hintze@gmx.net]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 1999 5:23 AM

> I am very glad to see you here. It is valueable every time, if we
> can draw attention of these who have used Ruby for a certain time.
> 
> As I hope that Ruby can become more international in future, I enjoy
> everybody comes from ruby-list to ruby-talk :-))))

I am also very glad to see you whose knowledge is deep about programming.
I have to appreciate gotoken-san who introduces ruby-talk and
invites people in ruby-list.

[...]

> >As gotoken-san saying, the debugger is not part of the interpreter,
> >but has a few interfaces which supports debugging or tracing
> >like set_trace_func(),  caller(). You can see these used in debug.rb and trace.rb.

( I had mistaken here. Not 'trace.rb' but 'tracer.rb'. )

> And me, for example, like that! The most exellent languages have no
> debugger build-in (Ruby, Python, Perl ;-) Only interfaces are
> forseen. So if somebody doesn't like a certain debuuger, simply write
> a new one, without dragging the old one as uneccessary ballast!

I agree to deeply. Ruby has almost powerful debugger-interface.
But! although that certain debugger in ruby package seems to be
enough powerful and simple, it seems that it is not used so much...
I do not know the reason why... As you said, lack of ruby-debug.el?
confortable GUI? humm....

BTW, I like vi for editing. I never use ruby-mode.el. :-)

> ># Although NaHi imitated Cle, NaHi don't know the meaning of '\' in
> >a head. :-)
> 
> Do you know TeX? TeX is a typesetting system; a language you use to
> structure text during write. No WYSIWYG! After compilation the text
> can be print out. Very beautiful.
[...]

Thank you for explanation. Although I use only LaTeX instead of (raw)TeX,
I has seen much command which starts by '\'.
You created your hand-written signature! using MetaFont! That's cool...

Now I know, unlike '\cle', '\NaHi' causes a compilation error.

> \cle

\begin{flushright}
NaHi
\end{flushright}

In This Thread