From: gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
Date: 1999-07-13T11:53:31+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:00475] Re: Now another totally different ;-)

In message "[ruby-talk:00473] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"
    on 99/07/13, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:
>Sure.  But I've not decided yet about usage of `classname[]' as a
>conversion.  For exapmle, should I change the behavior of Array[1.0]
>as Array(1.0)?  Maybe I should.

Maybe not all classes are fitting such convension. 
But all mathematical classes seem to be approprieate to that.

-- gotoken