[#407] New feature for Ruby? — Clemens.Hintze@...
Hi all,
27 messages
1999/07/01
[#413] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/01
Hi Clemens,
[#416] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/01
On Thu, 01 Jul 1999, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#418] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/01
Hi
[#426] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/02
Hi,
[#427] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/02
On Fri, 02 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#428] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/03
Hi,
[#429] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/03
On Sat, 03 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#430] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/05
Hi,
[#431] Re: New feature for Ruby?
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/07
On Mon, 05 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#440] Now another totally different ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
21 messages
1999/07/09
[#441] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/09
Hi,
[#442] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/09
On Fri, 09 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#452] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/11
Hi,
[#462] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/12
Hello, there.
[#464] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/12
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/07/12
Hi,
[#468] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/12
In message "[ruby-talk:00467] Re: Now another totally different ;-)"
[#443] — Michael Hohn <hohn@...>
Hello,
26 messages
1999/07/09
[#444] interactive ruby, debugger
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/07/09
Hi Michael,
[#448] Re: interactive ruby, debugger
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
1999/07/10
Hi,
[#450] Re: interactive ruby, debugger
— Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
1999/07/10
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, you wrote:
[#490] Some questions concerning GC in Ruby extensions — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi matz,
6 messages
1999/07/14
[#501] Ruby 1.3.5 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.5 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/07/15
[#519] CGI.rb — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi...
7 messages
1999/07/24
[#526] Another way for this? And a new proposal! — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
6 messages
1999/07/25
[ruby-talk:00495] Re: Now another totally different ;-)
From:
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date:
1999-07-14 19:25:36 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #495
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, you wrote: >In message "[ruby-talk:00480] Re: Now another totally different ;-)" > on 99/07/13, Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes: [...] >Don't be sorry! I was so dull that it takes several days to see what >you propose. Not you was dull, but my explanaition tries were :-) But with time, I think I will get more accustomate, I hope :-))) [...] >Exactly. I vote for repeal of Enumerable#index. So we are two then! :-) [...] > >Perhaps the decision is not made. I'd like to hear other guys' >opinions. I also would like. But unfortunately, the most Ruby cracks seem reside on the japanese list (but I really can not imagine why ;-) It is really a pitty, that we have two lists! Without you, we even would not have a chance to know, what the other guys discuss.But now, it seems, they also don't know, what we discuss, do they? Perhaps such proposals should be mirrored to the japanese list as well. I assume that most Japanese which deal with programming, can at least read english, if not writing it? Then they could, at least, know, what we discuss, and discuss it as well on the japanese list. If a decision was made, it could be post on both lists. I think, we should take actions, that the japanese Ruby elite and we beginners can join together for the sake of Ruby in the world. Please imagine how many poor Python, Perl or whatever programmers have to use their limited and/or uncomfortable language because the don't know Ruby ;-))))))) Why they don't know? Because they don't know people using it! If many people would using it, much more people would like to learn it! > >>Sorry for seeming unpatient. I only try to keep you sleepless ;-)))) > >It may be nice for me because I sleep too much everyday Zzzz... Hah! You lie! I regulary see, what do you do only for Ruby, and then there are such unimportant things like earn-money-for-living and such. I really cannot imagine that you have time to sleep :-) Perhaps in the 25th hour of the day ;-) > >-- gotoken \cle